Aamara Capital12 Oct 2026 · For internal use only

Tega Industries Ltd

NSE: TEGA · BSE: 543413 · Mining consumables & grinding media · Kolkata
CMP
₹1,908
Mkt Cap
₹14,338 Cr
EV (pro-forma)
~₹25,500 Cr

Tega Industries Ltd

NSE: TEGA · BSE: 543413 · Listed 13 Dec 2021 · Industrials / Mining consumables · Data as of 12 Oct 2026 (price stamp Screener.in 1:34 pm IST)
Read this first: two corrections to the brief
  • The promoters are the Mohanka family, not "Mehrotra". Madan Mohan Mohanka is the founder and Chairman; his son Mehul Mohanka is MD & Group CEO. Promoter vehicle Nihal Fiscal Services Pvt Ltd holds 49.88%. [Fact: FY26 Annual Report, note 19A]
  • McNally Sayaji Engineering no longer trades under that name. It was acquired through an NCLT resolution plan on 24 Feb 2023 and renamed Tega McNally Minerals Ltd (TMML). It forms the whole "Equipment" segment. [Fact: AR FY26 note 42; CRISIL May-2026]
CMP
₹1,908
−1.37% on day · 12 Oct 2026 [Fact]
Market cap
₹14,338 Cr
7.51 Cr shares; 7.56 Cr after pending AP Jupiter allotment
52-week high / low
₹2,198 / 1,473
Preferential price ₹1,994 (Nov-25, Oct-26)
Pro-forma EV
~₹25,500 Cr
Includes Molycop debt and Apollo preference shares [Est.]
FY26 Revenue (ops)
₹1,692 Cr
+3.3% YoY, pre-Molycop [Fact]
FY26 PAT (reported)
₹143 Cr
Adj. ₹227 Cr ex ₹84 Cr one-offs [Fact]
FY26 Op. EBITDA margin
13.7%
Reported, ex other income. Adjusted ex-OI: 18.6% [Est.]
RoE / RoCE (FY26)
5.9% / 8.1%
Diluted by ₹1,713 Cr of cash raised and not yet deployed at year-end

Company card

HeadquartersGodrej Waterside, Salt Lake Sector V, Kolkata 700091
Founded1976 (Madan Mohan Mohanka). First plant at Kalyani in 1978
EmployeesTega ~2,000 · TMML ~900 · Molycop ~1,500 as printed in the AR (standalone TIL: 655)
Promoter groupMohanka family: 67.51% (Jun-26), nil pledge
SectorMining consumables: mill liners, screens, hydrocyclones, grinding media; mineral-processing equipment
Footprint26 plants post-Molycop (company figure; CRISIL counts 24), customers in 92+ countries
AuditorWalker Chandiok & Co LLP. FY26 opinion unmodified
Credit ratingCRISIL A+/Stable and A1, downgraded from AA-/A1+ (Watch Developing) on 14 May 2026; ICRA A+/A1 (19 May 2026)
IndexNot a Nifty 50/Next 50 constituent. Broad-market small-cap indices are not verified [Not verified]

In plain English

Tega makes the parts that wear out inside a mine's processing plant. These are rubber, polymer and steel "liners" that protect the inside of huge rotating grinding mills, plus screens that sort ore by size, hydrocyclones that separate it, and chute and conveyor wear parts. Mines replace them every few months whether metal prices are up or down. About 78% of sales came from outside India in FY26.

On 1 Jun 2026 Tega bought Molycop together with Apollo funds. Molycop is "a leading global supplier of grinding media" (company/CRISIL) with ">50% market share in our core regions" (Molycop COO) [Fact: management claims]. Its forged steel balls are the "media" that tumble inside those mills. The deal valued Molycop at about US$1.455 bn of enterprise value, roughly 8x Tega's own pre-deal revenue. Tega owns 84.18% and Apollo 15.82%, plus Apollo holds about US$270 mn of preference shares.

The new group's revenue is now ~85–90% grinding media on a full-year basis. It is a much larger company, but a lower-margin and much more leveraged one.

Quick verdict scorecard

Business
Strong
Leading global grinding-media supplier (>50% share in core regions, per management), plus the #2 polymer-liner maker by 2020 revenue (F&S, RHP). ~98% of Q1 FY27 revenue was consumables.
Management
Medium
Bold deal-maker. But three CFOs in 12 months, repeated misses on consumables guidance, and slipping timelines.
Financial
Weak
Post-deal gross debt/EBITDA is ~4.7–5.3x. Rating cut to A+. Q1 FY27 reported loss of ₹108 Cr.
Valuation
Fair
~12x pro-forma LTM EV/EBITDA versus global peers at 13–17x. The P/E is ~26–58x depending on whether June's Molycop finance cost was one-off.
Overall
Neutral
This is a show-me integration story. Deleveraging and Molycop's finance cost will set the equity value.

Data freshness: market data from Screener.in and stockanalysis.com, 12 Oct 2026 intraday. Financials from the FY26 Annual Report (AGM 24 Sep 2026), Q1 FY27 results and presentation (13 Aug 2026), and the Q1 FY27 call transcript (filed 20 Aug 2026). Latest exchange filing reviewed: 7 Oct 2026.

Analyst Notes

Editorial opening: what changed, what the market is pricing, what to watch [Analyst View throughout unless tagged]

Tega has become a different company. Until May 2026 it was a ~₹1,700 Cr, net-cash, ~20%-margin maker of mill liners that compounded at mid-teens. On 1 June it closed the Molycop acquisition, a ~US$1.455 bn EV forged grinding-media business, with Apollo as minority partner. In Q1 FY27, which included Molycop for one month (June), Molycop was already 75% of group revenue. A full quarter will push that to ~85–90%. Anyone holding Tega for the old liner thesis now owns mainly a steel-ball maker with a liner business attached.

The headline Q1 numbers flatter less than they seem. Legacy Tega posted "+42% EBITDA, 22.1% margin". However, Tega's EBITDA includes other income, and that other income was swollen by treasury yield on the ₹1,713 Cr preferential proceeds parked from November to June. Stripping other income out, legacy operating EBITDA margin was 17.5% in Q1 FY27 versus 15.6% in Q1 FY26 and 18.6% in FY26 versus 20.7% in FY25 [Est.: (adj. EBITDA − other income) ÷ revenue from ops]. Q1 operating EBITDA still rose ~36% YoY, so the improvement is real, but it starts from a weak FY26 base.

FY26 was a miss. Consumables revenue was flat at ₹1,434 Cr. Management had guided 15%, then cut to ~8% in February, then delivered 0%. It blamed Middle East shipping disruption, with ~₹50 Cr of finished goods stuck (≈₹100 Cr of revenue). That was the third straight year below the 15% "long-term CAGR" guide (FY24 ~10%, FY25 ~11%). The Q1 rebound (+36%) partly reflects Q4 spill-over, which management itself admitted.

The deal maths is sensible, but the capital structure eats the equity. The purchase multiple is about 7.6x Molycop's LTM EBITDA of US$191 mn, or ~8.2x including the US$120 mn contingent earn-out due FY28 [Est.]. Global peers trade at 13–17x. The catch is below EBITDA. In June alone Molycop's finance cost was ₹97 Cr against ₹163 Cr of adjusted EBITDA, leaving adjusted PAT of just ₹10 Cr (0.8% of revenue) [Fact: Q1 PPT]. Group debt is ₹11,200 Cr including ~₹2,600 Cr of Apollo preference shares [Fact: CFO, Q1 call]. CRISIL projects debt/EBITDA of 4.0–4.5x in FY27, against a downgrade trigger of 4.25x.

What the market is pricing. At ₹1,908, the stock trades ~29x consensus forward P/E (4 analysts, average target ₹1,799, "Hold"). That implies roughly ₹65 EPS. Treating June's Molycop finance cost as run-rate gives only ~₹33 EPS. Using the guided debt service gives ~₹70–73. The market is pricing the benign case [Est.]. The gap between those two numbers is the whole debate. On EV/EBITDA the stock is reasonable (~12x LTM pro-forma). On equity earnings it is fair only if June's finance cost was largely one-off.

What tempers the bear case. (1) Roughly 98% of revenue is now consumables or grinding media, replaced in proportion to tonnes milled rather than metal price. (2) ~85% of Molycop contracts pass steel-bar cost through via indices, protecting margin per ton. (3) Copper above US$14,000/t and gold around US$4,400/oz (Molycop COO, Aug-26) keep mines running at full throughput. (4) The restarts of Cobre Panama and Grasberg are pure upside, and trigger the earn-out only if their EBITDA arrives.

What amplifies the risk. (1) Tega's three CFOs in 12 months (Khaitan, then interim Ganguly, then Joshi from 6 Aug 2026), in the very year the balance sheet was rebuilt. (2) The leverage target slid from "net debt/EBITDA <2.5x in four years" (Sep-25) to "3x in 3–4 years" (Jun-26). (3) Shareholders approved an enabling raise of up to ₹4,000 Cr, and CRISIL notes management intends fresh equity for deleveraging, so dilution overhang is real. (4) Molycop's goodwill of ~₹5,000 Cr (US$528 mn, provisional) now exceeds Tega's entire pre-deal net worth.

The watch-list for the next four quarters: the first full Molycop quarter (Q2 FY27, due ~Nov 2026), and specifically Molycop finance cost per month and attributable PAT. After that: the Chile plant reaching commercial production (now guided Mar-2027, pushed back from ~Aug-2026 over successive calls), synergy evidence (US$20 mn guided over 2–2.5 years), and any QIP.

My bottom line: a good industrial franchise bought at a fair EBITDA multiple, financed in a way that leaves little for common shareholders for two to three years. Neutral until the first full Molycop quarter shows the real below-EBITDA run-rate.

Business Deep-Dive

Products, processes, plants, moat, customers, IP

What Tega sells, product by product

Product familyWhat it doesMaterial / techWhere madeNature
Mill liners (incl. DynaPrime™ hybrid liners)Protect the shells of SAG, AG and ball mills that grind ore. Design affects throughput and energy use.Rubber, polymer, rubber-steel composite, steel/ceramic hybrids. DynaPrime is the high-performance hybrid (TM granted 2019), growing ">20%" per management.Kalyani (DynaPrime), Samali, Dahej, Chile, South Africa (ex-DynaPrime)Recurring consumable
Screens & screen panels; trommelsSize-classify ore and slurryPolyurethane, rubber (screen-panel patent 2010)Samali, Dahej, Chile, SA, AustraliaRecurring
HydrocyclonesClassify particles in the grinding circuitRubber/ceramic-linedSamali, KalyaniRecurring spares
Wear products: chute liners, mosaic liners, pump liners, pipes and pipe repair, spilexProtect material-handling surfacesRubber, ceramic, polyurethane (mosaic-liner patent 2013)All six Tega plantsRecurring
Conveyor productsBelt-cleaning and impact components for bulk handlingRubber, polyurethane. Historic Hosch (GB) alliance from 1991; Hosch Equipment (India) is a JVSamali, KalyaniRecurring
Equipment (TMML): crushers, vibrating screens, feeders, ball mills, thickeners, flotation cells, filter presses, pumps, sand-washing plantsCapital equipment for beneficiation, aggregates and power (coal handling)Fabricated steel. New aggregates product with a Japanese collaborator due to launch in Q3 FY27Vadodara, Bengaluru, Asansol, KumardubiProject / cyclical
Grinding media (Molycop): forged steel balls (SAG and ball-mill sizes), high-chrome cast media, rodsSteel balls tumble in mills and physically break ore. Consumed continuously in kg per tonne of ore milled.Forged steel from steel bar (bar ≈80% of COGS). Hi-chrome from own plants (~20kt in the Middle East region plus Indonesia) and from contract manufacturers. Forged capacity ~1.7 Mt at ~70% utilisation.15 facilities in 9 countries (AR map; 13 plants + 2 JVs per Chairman)Recurring, indexed
Molycop chemicals, instrumentation, digitalFlotation chemicals (Peru); mill and process instrumentation (Gainesville USA, Perth); rail wheels and fasteners (Waratah/Perth)The technology/digital share is "very small" but at ~2x the margin; management targets ~25% growthUSA, Peru, AustraliaMixed

Manufacturing footprint

EntityLocationSinceCapabilities
Tega (6 plants, 4 countries)Kalyani, West Bengal1978DynaPrime, conveyor products, chute liners, pump liners, hydrocyclones
Samali (Joka), Kolkata1985Mill liners, wear products, hydrocyclones, screens, trommels, conveyor products. 587 kWp solar
Dahej SEZ, Gujarat2013Mill liners, wear products, screens, trommels. Industry 4.0, ZLD-ready
Chile (Tega Industries Chile SpA, ex-Acotec)2011Mill liners, trommels, chute liners, screens, pipe spools. New greenfield plant under construction (capex US$25–35 mn; soft start Jan-27, commercial production Mar-27)
South Africa (ex-Beruc Equipments)2006Mill liners (ex-DynaPrime), spilex, screen panels, chute liners, trommels
Australia (Losugen)2010/11Chute liners, trommels
TMML (4 plants, India)Vadodara, Gujarat2023*Crushers, vibrating screens, feeders, material-handling equipment
Bengaluru, Karnataka2023*Thickeners, pumps, filter presses, flotation cells, sand washing
Asansol, West Bengal2023*Vibrating screens, feeders, ball mills, crushers, job shop
Kumardubi, Jharkhand2023*Mills, crushers, screens, feeders, job shop
Molycop (15 facilities, 9 countries)Canada: KamloopsGrinding media
USA: Kansas City · Gainesville · Vinton (JV)Grinding media · instrumentation · grinding media (JV)
Mexico: El SaltoDistribution, laboratory, grinding media
Spain: SevilleGrinding media
Peru: La Joya · LimaLab, grinding media, flotation chemicals
Chile: Mejillones · TalcahuanoGrinding media
Ivory Coast: Abidjan (JV)Grinding media
Indonesia: Cilegon · CikandeLab, grinding media (incl. hi-chrome)
Australia: Waratah · PerthLab, grinding media, rail wheels · instrumentation, fasteners

*Acquisition date of TMML (24 Feb 2023); the plants themselves are older McNally Sayaji facilities. Source: FY26 AR pp.16–17, 48–49. Plant-level capacity figures are not disclosed for Tega; Molycop forged capacity is ~1.7 Mt (Sep-25 call).

Moat: why Tega is hard to replace [Analyst View]

IP, R&D and certifications

Patents include a liner-preparation method (1992 application), an improved screen panel (granted 2010) and mosaic liners for chutes (2013). DynaPrime™ was trademarked in 2019. R&D is based in India and Chile and focuses on smart, IT-enabled products and recycling, including a planned facility to recover rubber and metal from end-of-life liners. Tega is an ISO 9001:2015 company (letterhead), with occupational health and safety systems at Kolkata HQ, Samali, Kalyani and Dahej. Chile holds the HuellaChile GHG seal. A full certification list (ISO 14001/45001 scope) is not consolidated in the filings reviewed.

Customers, go-to-market and exports

Segment Analysis

Reported as two segments to FY26 (Consumables, Equipment). From Q1 FY27 reported in three: Consumables, Molycop (Grinding Media), Equipment

Segment revenue and EBITDA (₹ Mn)

SegmentFY24FY25FY26FY26 YoYQ1 FY26Q1 FY27Q1 YoY
Consumables revenue~12,900 [Est.]14,30114,340+0.3%2,9103,960+36%
Equipment (TMML) revenuen.a.2,1572,688+24.6%643358−44%
Grinding media (Molycop) revenue–––––12,916 (June only)n.m.
Consumables segment EBITDA (ex other income)n.a.3,149 (22.0%)1,974 reported (13.8%); ~2,813 adj (~19.6%) [Est.]−37% rep.~608 (20.9%)~955 (24.1%)+58%
Equipment segment EBITDAn.a.251 (11.7%)340 (12.7%)+35%n.a.~0 (breakeven)n.m.
Molycop adj. EBITDA–––––1,628 (12.6%)+3% vs Jun-25 (USD)
Group revenue from ops14,92716,38716,919+3.3%3,56117,234+384%

Sources: AR FY26 note 42 (FY25/FY26), Q1 FY27 call (segment Q1), Q1 PPT. Q1 consumables margins are as stated by management (24.1% vs 20.9%) and may include other income. FY24 segment split not extracted (FY24 AR reported only consolidated in the pages reviewed), hence the estimate. Adjusted FY26 consumables EBITDA assumes all ₹839 Mn of one-offs sit in Consumables.

Mix shift: what the company is now

Q1 FY27 mix (1 month Molycop)
23 / 75 / 2
Consumables / Molycop / Equipment (% of revenue) [Fact: CFO]
Full-year pro-forma mix
~9 / ~89 / ~2
Using Molycop ~US$1.55 bn and Tega FY26 split [Est.]
Recurring revenue share
~98%
Consumables plus grinding media, versus CRISIL's ~75% repeat-order figure for legacy Tega [Est.]

Consumables (legacy Tega)

Mill liners, screens, hydrocyclones, wear and conveyor products. Gross margin is 57–62%, with EBITDA guided at 22–23%. Long-term growth guide is 15% CAGR. Actuals were FY24 ~10%, FY25 ~11%, FY26 ~0% and Q1 FY27 +36% (part catch-up). DynaPrime is the fastest-growing line at >20%. Price pass-through on raw materials and freight works with a ~1-quarter lag.

Equipment (TMML)

Crushers, screens, mills and beneficiation equipment for Indian mining, aggregates and power. Gross margin is 40–50%, with EBITDA of 12–14%, up from ~5% when acquired. FY26 grew +25% on the NMDC order. FY27 guidance is +25% growth at 12–13% EBITDA. Q1 FY27 fell 44% on customer clearance delays. This is the only segment that behaves like a capital-goods cycle.

New order (Sep-2026): TMML signed a ₹126 Cr (ex-GST) contract with Kalpataru Projects International for engineering services and equipment supply (design, manufacture, inspection, transport, erection supervision, performance-guarantee testing), to be executed over 14 months [Fact: per Sahi, 21 Sep 2026; exchange filing not retrieved]. That is ~47% of TMML's FY26 revenue of ₹269 Cr and should support the H2 FY27 equipment recovery [Analyst View].

Grinding media (Molycop)

Forged and hi-chrome balls. Gross margin is ~36%, with EBITDA of ~12–13% (target 15%, and 16–17% by year 5). Volume in the 12 months to Jun-26 was 1.204 Mt versus 1.223 Mt the year before. EBITDA rose 11% to US$191 mn. Ten-month outlook to Mar-27: volume +~5%, EBITDA +~4%. Hi-chrome is the growth vector: 62kt supplied now, with a 200kt goal and ~20% growth.

Cycle exposure: copper/gold sensitivity and recurring share [Analyst View on synthesis]
  • End-market: ~83–84% of Molycop revenue/volume comes from copper and gold. Copper and gold were also 75% of the global mill-liner market in 2020 (F&S, RHP). The group is a leveraged play on copper/gold ore throughput.
  • Throughput, not price: liners and grinding balls are consumed per tonne milled (aftermarket spend ≈3x upfront mill capex over its life, per RHP). Revenue follows mine operating rates, which stay high while copper is >US$14,000/t and gold ~US$4,400/oz. A price crash hurts only if mines cut throughput or close.
  • Price indexation: ~85% of Molycop contracts are steel-indexed, so revenue moves with steel while profit per ton is protected. Tega passes rubber and freight costs through with a ~1-quarter lag.
  • Recurring share: ~98% of Q1 FY27 revenue was consumables or media. Equipment (TMML) is ~2% and is the only capex-cyclical piece. Legacy Tega repeat orders were 74–80% (FY19–Q1 FY22, RHP) and ~75% (CRISIL).
  • Mine-specific shocks matter more than the cycle: Cobre Panama's closure and Grasberg's mud rush cut Molycop volume 1.6% (1.223 → 1.204 Mt). Their restart is built-in upside, and it also triggers the US$120 mn earn-out.
Fastest grower vs. segment under pressure

Fastest: DynaPrime within consumables (>20%), and hi-chrome within Molycop (~20% guided). Under pressure: Equipment in Q1 FY27 (−44%), and Molycop forged-media volume (−1.6% in the year to Jun-26), hit by Cobre Panama's care-and-maintenance and Grasberg's mud-rush outage. Management attributes the 2023–24 loss of "two major customers" to mine closures, not competitive loss.

Management's stated focus by segment

Financials: P&L

Consolidated, ₹ Cr unless stated. Source: Screener.in (consolidated), FY26 AR, quarterly PPTs

Five-year annual P&L

₹ CrFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Revenue from operations9521,2141,4931,6391,692
YoY growth18.1%27.5%23.0%9.8%3.2%
Gross margin (company)n.a.n.a.~57%57%60%
Operating EBITDA (ex OI, reported)184271317341233
Op. EBITDA margin19.2%22.3%21.2%20.7%13.7%
Adj. op. EBITDA margin (ex one-offs, ex OI) [Est.]19.2%22.3%21.2%20.7%18.6%
Other income2725274888
Depreciation39416410195
EBIT (OP + OI − D&A)172255280288226
Interest1719332824
PBT155236247259201
Tax rate25%22%22%23%29%
PAT (reported)117184194200143
PAT margin12.3%15.2%13.0%12.2%8.5%
Adj. PAT (company)–––200227 / 208*
EPS (₹, basic per AR)17.6327.7329.1430.0820.54
DPS (₹)–2.02.02.02.0

*Company PPT adj. PAT ₹226.6 Cr; Directors' Report "PAT excluding one-time expenses" ₹208.5 Cr. The two adjusted figures differ, a reconciliation gap. FY22–FY25 margins from AR "operating EBITDA" (19.22/22.27/21.17/20.74/13.66%). FY23 DPS taken from Screener's 7% payout ratio (≈₹2) [Est.]. EBIT is computed. Screener FY26 EPS of 18.99 uses year-end shares; the AR basic EPS of 20.54 uses the weighted average.

9521,2141,4931,6391,692 FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26 19.2%22.3%21.2%20.7%13.7% (18.6% adj)
Revenue from operations (₹ Cr, bars) and operating EBITDA margin ex other income (gold). FY26 is depressed by ₹84 Cr of one-offs.

Last eight quarters (consolidated)

₹ CrSep-24Dec-24Mar-25Jun-25Sep-25Dec-25Mar-26Jun-26*
Revenue3534095363564054045271,723
YoY−6.4%20.3%5.7%4.7%14.7%−1.2%−1.7%384%
QoQ3.8%15.9%31.1%−33.6%13.8%−0.2%30.4%227%
Op. EBITDA (ex OI)34911505669466056
OPM10%22%28%16%17%11%11%3%
Adj. EBITDA incl OI (company)–103157718577163264
Other income151271718153718
Interest7676665117
PAT (reported)75410235452043−108
Adj. PAT (company)––10235––10955

*Jun-26 = Q1 FY27, including Molycop for June only. Screener's EPS for the quarter is −14.41; the company-reported EPS is −11.47, and the difference likely comes from the minority share of Molycop's loss. Dec-25 and Mar-26 operating EBITDA include ₹77.6 Cr of Molycop deal costs and ₹6.4 Cr of labour-code charges. Company adjusted EBITDA is ₹600→773 Mn (Q3) and ₹967→1,632 Mn (Q4). Note that Q3 FY26 reported EBITDA is stated as 600 Mn including other income.

3534095363564054045271,723 Sep-24Dec-24Mar-25Jun-25Sep-25Dec-25Mar-26Jun-26
Quarterly revenue, ₹ Cr. Black = legacy Tega; gold = Molycop (June 2026 only, ₹1,292 Cr).

Q1 FY27 three-column P&L (₹ Mn) [Fact: Q1 FY27 investor presentation]

LineTega (ex-Molycop)Grinding media (June)Group Q1 FY27Q1 FY26
Revenue from operations4,318.012,916.417,234.43,560.9
Other income256.5−82.4174.1155.3
Gross margin62%36%42%59%
Adj. EBITDA (incl. OI)1,011.31,628.12,639.4711.3
Adj. EBITDA ex OI ÷ revenue [Est.]17.5%13.2%14.3%15.6%
One-time (acquisition/integration)~56.5~1,8531,910–
Depreciation & amortisation251.3485.0736.2230.9
Finance cost193.2973.91,167.161.8
PBT (reported)519.6−1,684.3−1,164.8432.1
PAT (reported)401.2−1,483.7−1,082.5353.4
Adj. PAT443.7103.3547.0353.4
EPS / Adj. EPS (₹)––−11.47 / 6.885.31
Earnings-quality flags
  • One-off conflict. The Q1 PPT footnote states one-time expenses of ₹1,910 Mn (₹191 Cr) in Q1 alone, with a ~₹280 Mn tax effect. On the call an analyst summed the totals as "₹110 Cr this time and ₹75–80 Cr last year = ₹190 Cr", and management agreed. Filed numbers give a cumulative ~₹269 Cr of Molycop-related one-offs (₹77.6 Cr in FY26 plus ₹191 Cr in Q1), excluding ₹6.4 Cr of labour code. Treat the "₹190 Cr" call figure as wrong.
  • "EBITDA" includes other income. FY26 other income nearly doubled to ₹81.6 Cr from ₹43.2 Cr, mainly ₹80.6 Cr of FVTPL gains on the parked ₹1,713 Cr preferential-issue proceeds. That income falls away after June 2026.
  • Molycop's June finance cost of ₹97.4 Cr is almost as large as its EBITDA net of D&A. It likely includes preference-share coupons, which are treated as debt, plus refinancing amortisation. Do not annualise it blindly, but management has not split it out.
  • Organic vs inorganic: FY22–FY26 growth was organic except for TMML (from Feb-23; FY24 equipment revenue was not separately reported in the pages reviewed). Q1 FY27 growth is ~95% inorganic.
  • Volume vs price: Tega does not disclose liner tonnage. Molycop revenue per ton is ~₹118/kg (analyst calculation) and moves with steel indices, so its revenue growth is a poor gauge of volume.

Balance Sheet, Cash Flow & Ratios

Consolidated, ₹ Cr. FY26 balance sheet is pre-Molycop (closed 1 Jun 2026)

Balance sheet summary

₹ Cr (31 Mar)FY22FY23FY24FY25FY2630 Jun 2026 (indicative)
Equity capital666667677575
Reserves6709831,1251,3303,332n.d.
Net worth7361,0491,1921,3973,407CRISIL FY27E ~4,529
Borrowings245361308330398~11,200 incl. ~2,600 pref.
Fixed assets (net)298548600623661n.d.
CWIP10121148111Chile plant
Goodwillsmallsmallsmallsmallsmall~5,000 (provisional, US$528 mn)
Investments (non-current, Screener)199217279262227–
Cash & equivalentsn.a.n.a.n.a.1141,164Molycop min. liquidity US$45–50 mn
Inventories [Est. alignment]n.a.n.a.n.a.415437n.d.
Trade receivables [Est. alignment]n.a.n.a.n.a.501452n.d.
Other assets (Screener; incl. inventory, receivables)6638529951,1573,311–
Total assets1,1701,6291,8852,0894,310n.d.

FY23 fixed-asset jump reflects TMML consolidation. FY26 cash of ₹1,164 Cr (AR cash flow statement) holds the preferential proceeds before the June close. FY25/FY26 inventory and receivable values come from layout-extracted AR text and carry an Est. tag; FY22–FY24 values were not extracted (see the days below). n.d. = not disclosed in Q1 materials. The 30-Jun debt figure is from CFO Ravi Joshi (Q1 call).

Post-closing debt bridge [Fact unless tagged]

ItemAmountSource / note
Molycop gross debt pre-deal~US$1.0–1.05 bnSep-25 call; Jun-26 call ("more than US$1,050 mn"). Includes the JPM-arranged ~US$947 mn facility (Nov-24).
Planned day-one Molycop debtUS$780 mnSep-25 deal call
Molycop debt taken over at closeUS$838 mnJun-26 call (Himanshu Raijada). Paid down ~US$220–235 mn at closing.
Molycop term loan (CRISIL)~₹6,630 CrAfter Apollo preference money is applied
Molycop net debt, 30 Jun 2026US$672.5 mn (₹6,366 Cr)vs US$1.0 bn (₹9,580 Cr) at 31 Mar 2026. Molycop ABL ~US$220 mn, 49% used.
Parent acquisition term loan₹1,500 CrStandard Chartered (with Axis and EXIM mentioned); matures 31 May 2033
Apollo preference sharesUS$270 mn (~₹2,473–2,600 Cr)The company calls them "redeemable" (CFO). CRISIL calls them "perpetual, no call option, cumulative, above-market coupon" and treats them as 50% debt. Coupon not disclosed.
Group total debt incl. preference shares~₹11,200 CrCFO, Q1 FY27 call
Contingent consideration (quasi-debt)US$120 mn (~₹1,130 Cr)Due FY28 if the closed mines (Cobre Panama, Grasberg) restore EBITDA. Funded from accruals.
Apollo common-equity minority15.82% (US$74 mn invested)CRISIL
Guided finance cost₹110–120 Cr full yearQ1 call, ambiguous. This matches ₹1,500 Cr at ~7.5%, so it is probably parent-level only [Est.]. Molycop interest plus principal is ~US$70 mn over Jun-26 to Mar-27.
Leverage reality check [Est.]

Pro-forma LTM EBITDA is ~₹2,110 Cr (Molycop US$191 mn × ~₹94, plus legacy Tega FY26 adj. ex-OI ₹315 Cr). Gross debt/EBITDA is ~5.3x if the preference shares count fully as debt, or ~4.7x under CRISIL's 50% treatment. Net debt/EBITDA is ~5.0x / ~4.4x. CRISIL's downgrade trigger is debt/EBITDA >4.25x (net >4x), and its FY27 projection is 4.0–4.5x. There is little headroom until synergies, the US$70–75 mn of non-core asset sales, or fresh equity arrive.

Cash flow and earnings conversion

₹ CrFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Cash from operations (CFO)14*179*252*195350
Capex (payment for capital assets)n.a.n.a.n.a.59 [Est. alignment]136 [Est. alignment]
Free cash flown.a.n.a.n.a.~136~214
FCF yield on current market cap–––0.9%1.5%
PAT117184194200143
CFO / PAT0.12x0.97x1.30x0.97x2.46x
Cash from investing−25*−235*−96*−129−991 (incl. bank deposits)
Cash from financing3*63*−115*−38+1,690 (₹1,703 Cr equity)

*FY22–FY24 from Screener. Screener shows 10 values against 12 year columns, so these are aligned on the assumption that the last 10 cover FY17–FY26 [Est.]. Screener's "FCF" row equals CFO and omits capex, so it was not used. FY25/FY26 CFO and capex come from the FY26 AR consolidated cash flow statement; capex columns were read from layout-extracted text [Est. alignment].

Conversion verdict

Five-year cumulative CFO (FY22–26) of ~₹990 Cr against cumulative PAT of ₹838 Cr gives ~1.18x, which is acceptable. FY26's 2.46x is flattered by working capital: payable days jumped from 116 to 178 and receivable days fell from 112 to 97. Management called the payable move a one-off "payable improvement". FY22's 0.12x shows how working capital-heavy this business is in growth years. Molycop runs 70–80 working-capital days, against Tega's ~153-day cash conversion cycle and 219 gross current asset days.

Working-capital and return ratios

Days / %FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Debtor days10612110911297
Inventory days229200209217233
Payable days8877104116178
Cash conversion cycle247244215212153
Working-capital days921098610077
ROCE (Screener)~19–21%~19–21%~18–19%~18%8.1%
ROE~16%~18%~16%~14%5.9%
Interest coverage (CRISIL)––11.4x14.2xn.a.
Fixed-asset turnover (Rev ÷ net FA)3.2x2.2x2.5x2.6x2.6x

The ROCE row on Screener has 11 values against 12 years, so FY22–FY25 are shown as ranges. FY22–FY25 ROE is computed as PAT ÷ year-end net worth [Est.]; FY26 5.9% is Screener's (average equity). On year-end net worth FY26 ROE would be ~4.2%. Management targets a consolidated ROE of 18% "post-acquisition" (Sep-25), against 5.9% in FY26.

Capex plan

Credit rating and lenders

DateAgencyLong termShort termNote
27 Jan 2023CRISILA+/StableA1Reaffirmed (history table)
5 Apr 2024CRISILAA-/StableA1+Upgrade (date per history annexure; layout ambiguous)
19 Sep 2025CRISILAA- / Watch DevelopingA1+ / WatchMolycop term sheet
18 Dec 2025 · 18 Mar 2026CRISILAA- / Watch DevelopingA1+ / WatchWatch continued pending completion
14 May 2026CRISILA+/Stable (from AA-)A1 (from A1+)Downgrade on acquisition debt; removed from watch; limits raised to ₹2,000 Cr from ₹350 Cr
19 May 2026ICRAA+A1Full rationale not retrieved (page did not render)

CRISIL facilities: ₹1,500 Cr term loan (Standard Chartered); ₹221 Cr cash credit (Axis 20, StanChart 55, DBS 35, RBL 24, ICICI 40, Citi 47); ₹50 Cr LC/BG; ₹225 Cr proposed WC. FY26 standalone/legacy: net D/E 0.09x, finance cost down 16% to ₹22.6 Cr.

Equity dilution and share count

DateEventShares addedShares out
Nov 2021Conversion of Wagner's (TA Associates) CCPP before the IPO86,92,2816,62,93,149
Dec 2021IPO, pure offer for sale (no new shares)06,62,93,149
FY23–FY24ESOP-2011 exercises~2,42,3436,65,35,492
28 Nov 2025Preferential at ₹1,994 (promoters, institutions, HNIs, employees): ₹1,713.3 Cr85,92,2067,51,27,698
Pending (in-principle approval 6 Oct 2026)Preferential to AP Jupiter Holdings II, Ltd. at ₹1,994: ₹95.4 Cr4,78,4357,56,06,133
OverhangEGM 10 Oct 2025 enabling resolution: raise up to ₹4,000 Cr (QIP etc.). CRISIL cites "fresh equity" for deleveraging.?–

Share count up 14% since listing, almost all from the Nov-25 preferential. At CMP a further ₹2,000 Cr raise would mean ~1.05 Cr new shares, about 14% more dilution [Est.].

Key balance-sheet risks

Management, Promoters & Governance

Mohanka family-controlled; Apollo a partner at subsidiary level

Promoters

Madan Mohan Mohanka: Founder & Chairman

Founded Tega in 1976 and has been on the board since 15 May 1976 (50 years). Redesignated Non-Executive Chairman from 1 Feb 2025, paid a professional fee (FY26 ₹1.00 Cr, 19x the median employee). A special resolution at the 19 Sep 2025 AGM approved his pay exceeding 50% of the NED pool. Holds 7.32% directly. He sold 33.15 lakh shares in the 2021 IPO (₹150.2 Cr). Education is not stated in the filings reviewed.

Mehul Mohanka: MD & Group CEO

On the board since 6 Jun 2002 (24 years). Architect of the TMML and Molycop deals. FY26 remuneration ₹6.09 Cr (+14.5%; 104x median), against FY26 PAT down 29%. Holds 0.28% directly; the family holds the rest via Nihal Fiscal and trusts. He sold shares in FY24 for minimum public shareholding compliance. Other promoters: Manish Mohanka (stake moved to MM Mohanka in FY26) and Manju Mohanka.

Key management

NameRoleNote
Mehul MohankaMD & Group CEOPromoter
Ravi Narayan JoshiCFO (KMP) from 6 Aug 2026Third CFO in ~12 months
Shyama Prasad GangulyInterim CFO (May–Aug 2026)Presented Q4 FY26
Sharad Kumar KhaitanCFO until close of 5 May 2026FY26 pay ₹1.69 Cr; led the deal call in Sep-25 and left before closing
Manoj Kumar SinhaDirector, Global Operations–
Pratik Basu RoyPresident: Product Management, Global Sales, Marketing & R&D–
Sourav SenCEO, Tega McNally Minerals–
Himanshu RaijadaSenior finance executive on the Jun-26 call (title not stated)Gave Molycop debt figures
Manjuree RaiCompany Secretary, Global Head Legal; also Chief Risk OfficerFY26 pay ₹0.57 Cr
Lance Dawber / Patrick KoleyMolycop COO / CFORetained post-close. Molycop CEO not named on calls.

Board of directors (7)

NameRoleCategoryOn board sinceCommittees
Madan Mohan MohankaChairmanNon-Exec, Non-Indep (Promoter)May 1976–
Mehul MohankaMD & Group CEOExecutive (Promoter)Jun 2002Stakeholder/CSR member
Syed Yaver ImamDirectorNon-Exec, Non-IndepJul 2005NRC/Risk member
Madhu DubhashiDirectorIndependentMay 2021Chair, Audit Committee
Jagdishwar Prasad SinhaDirectorIndependentMay 2021Audit, NRC
Ashwani MaheshwariDirectorIndependentApr 2022Chair, NRC / Risk
Anand SenDirectorIndependentNov 2024Chair, Stakeholders

Independence 4/7 (57%), one woman director. FY26 attendance: IDs 95.45%, board 97.40%. Independent directors were paid ₹15–25 lakh commission each. On 13 Aug 2026 the board approved re-appointing Ashwani Maheshwari for a second five-year term (Apr 2027–Mar 2032), subject to shareholder approval [Fact: NSE Reg 30 intimation, 13 Aug 2026]. The board has no Apollo nominee at listed-company level (Apollo's governance rights sit at the Molycop HoldCo; details not disclosed).

Shareholding trend (%)

CategoryMar-24Mar-25Sep-25Dec-25Mar-26Jun-26
Promoters74.7874.8074.8067.2767.5167.51
FIIs1.481.731.871.482.142.80
DIIs19.1018.7610.7418.6318.9718.68
Public4.634.7012.5812.6311.3811.02
No. of shareholders56,86252,98657,44756,17453,86753,397

The Sep-25 swing (DII 18.38→10.74, public 5.07→12.58) reverses in Dec-25, which suggests a classification change rather than real selling [Est.]. Dec-25 promoter dilution came from the preferential issue. History: 85.17% pre-IPO, 79.17% (Mar-22), 74.78% (Mar-24, after promoters sold 27.25 lakh shares in the open market for minimum public shareholding compliance).

>5% holders (31 Mar 2026): Nihal Fiscal Services Pvt Ltd 49.88%; M M Business Trust 9.69%; Madan Mohan Mohanka 7.32%; Tata Small Cap Fund 5.58%; HDFC Small Cap Fund 5.42%. Promoter pledge: NIL [Fact].

Mar-24Jun-26 Promoter 74.8%Promoter 67.5% DII 19.1%DII 18.7% Black = promoter · purple = FII · gold = DII · grey = public

TA Associates: entry and exit [Fact: FY22 AR, Venture Intelligence, Avendus]

Wagner Ltd, an affiliate of TA Associates, invested in Apr–May 2011 (about US$35 mn per Avendus, the adviser). It received 76,893 equity shares plus 6,68,637 compulsorily convertible participatory preference shares, which became 9,99,609 equity and 86,92,281 CCPP after a 12:1 bonus in Oct 2013. The 2011 shareholders' agreement gave Wagner a put option on the promoters if no IPO happened. The CCPP converted in Nov 2021, and Wagner sold all 96,91,890 shares in the Dec-2021 IPO OFS for ₹439.0 Cr, a full exit at ₹453. The IPO (₹619.2 Cr, pure OFS, subscribed 219x) listed on 13 Dec 2021 at ₹760, a 68% premium. Tega received no IPO proceeds.

Insider / SAST activity

Related parties, auditor, legal

Subsidiaries and group structure

EntityCountryPurpose
Tega McNally Minerals LtdIndiaEquipment segment (ex-McNally Sayaji, NCLT 2023)
Tega Holdings Pte Ltd → Tega Holdings Pty, Losugen Pty, Tega Industries Chile SpA & subs, Tega Investments South Africa, Tega Industries AfricaSingapore / Australia / Chile / South AfricaOverseas manufacturing holding chain (impairment key audit matter)
Tega Industries Inc · Canada Inc · do Brasil · Ghana LtdUSA / Canada / Brazil / GhanaSales and service
Tega Industries Australia PtyAustraliaDe-registered 2 Jun 2026 (immaterial)
Tega MC Investment Pte (WOS; Tega subscribes 384,035,816 OCRPS under SSA of 13 Feb 2026, face value not disclosed; ≈US$384 mn if US$1 each [Est.]) → Tega MC JV Holdings, MC SG Holdings, MC SG Investments I/II/III, MC Global Holdings, MC Australia Holdings, MC Canada HoldCo, MC US IncSingapore / Australia / Canada / USAMolycop acquisition SPV chain. Tega holds 84.18% of HoldCo (Tega MC SG Investments III); Apollo holds 15.82% plus preference shares.
Molycop group (ex-AIP MC Holdings LLC) incl. JVs (Vinton USA, Abidjan)GlobalGrinding media, chemicals, instrumentation
Hosch Equipment (India) LtdIndiaJV (equity-accounted; FY26 share of profit ₹6.1 Cr)

Acquisition track record

YearTargetOutcome [Analyst View]
2006Beruc Equipments (South Africa)Now the South African plant. Integrated.
2011Losugen (Australia), Acotec (Chile)Chile became the LatAm hub and is getting a new greenfield. Australia small; one entity de-registered in 2026.
2023McNally Sayaji (NCLT)EBITDA lifted from ~5% to 12–14%, revenue ₹269 Cr in FY26. A success, though small.
2026Molycop (~US$1.455 bn EV, with Apollo)Too early to judge. Q1 shows Molycop EBITDA +3% YoY and "directionally ahead" of plan.
Governance red flags (ranked)
  1. CFO churn: three CFOs in about 12 months across the largest transaction in the company's history.
  2. Guidance credibility: consumables guidance missed three years running, the Chile commissioning date slipped repeatedly (~Aug-26 → Q2 FY27 → Q3–Q4 FY27 → Mar-27), the leverage target was loosened, and the Molycop FY27 growth comment (7–8% in a Dec-25 TV interview, versus 3% in Jun-26) was disowned on the call.
  3. Inconsistent deal disclosures: stake 77% (Sep-25), then 84% (Feb-26), then 84.18% (AR). Synergy figures moved between calls. CRISIL's own rationale contains internal inconsistencies (EV ₹13,325 Cr vs ₹13,313 Cr; upfront equity ₹3,809 Cr vs ₹4,313 Cr).
  4. MD pay up 14.5% in a year when PAT fell 29%.
  5. Mitigants: nil pledge, clean audit opinion, majority-independent board, immaterial contingent liabilities, and no material RPTs.

Supply Chain

Upstream dependencies and downstream customers. Where pricing power sits

↑ Upstream: what Tega depends on

InputUsed inDependence / riskPass-through
Steel bar (special bar quality, forging grade)Molycop forged grinding media~80% of Molycop COGS. Bought from regional steel mills by a large global procurement team; named suppliers not disclosed. Bar payment timing drives ABL swings.~85% of contracts are indexed to steel prices by region. Profit per ton is protected, so revenue rises and falls with steel.
Natural & synthetic rubber, carbon black, polyurethaneLiners, screens, wear productsCommodity and oil-linked. RM was 40.5% of FY26 revenue (42.6% in FY25). Supplier names not disclosed.~1-quarter lag (management). Gross margins held at 59–62%.
Steel inserts, castings, ceramicsHybrid and steel liners, DynaPrime, mosaic linersDomestic and importedContractual pass-through
Alloys (chrome) and scrapHi-chrome cast media~40kt of 62kt hi-chrome is sourced from contract manufacturers ("trading volume"). Chrome price risk.Indexed / negotiated
Freight: containers, vessels, land haulageIndia→LatAm/Africa/Australia exportsFY26 Middle East disruption stranded ~₹50 Cr of finished goods. Container rates are up in FY27.Passed through with ~1 quarter lag. Molycop hedges ocean freight.
Energy (gas/LPG/PNG, power)Forging and heat treatment; rubber curingMolycop land freight is affected by gas pricesPartly passed

Import dependence for Indian plants is not quantified in the filings reviewed. Single-source risk appears low: multiple plants per product, and Molycop sources bar from several regional mills [Analyst View].

↓ Downstream: who depends on Tega

Customer groupShare / evidenceStickiness
Copper and gold mines (concentrators)"Significant portion" of Tega. ~83–84% of Molycop revenue/volume.High. Liners are custom-designed and grinding media are consumed continuously.
Iron ore, coal, other minerals and aggregatesBalance of Tega. TMML serves NMDC, power and aggregates.Medium (TMML is project-based)
Bulk solids handling (ports, cement, power)Conveyor and wear productsMedium

Value-chain map

InputsSteel bar · rubber · polyurethane · ceramics · chrome alloys
→
Tega + MolycopDesign, forge and cast media; mould liners; install and monitor (26 plants)
→
Mine concentratorCrushing → SAG/ball mill grinding → classification → flotation
→
Concentrate / metalCopper, gold, iron ore
→
End useGrid, EVs, electronics, central banks, steel
Where pricing power sits [Analyst View]

Liners (Tega): pricing power is moderate to high. They are a small share of mine opex, failure costs a lot, and designs are bespoke, so Tega holds 57–62% gross margins and passes through costs. Grinding media (Molycop): low to moderate. The product is close to a commodity indexed to steel, its gross margin is ~36%, and it competes on local supply and service, but indexation protects per-ton margins. Mines hold the power in tenders. Steel mills have power over Molycop's input cost, but the index formulas transfer that power to the mine. The combined group's thesis is that bundling liners, media, instrumentation and digital ("complete mill optimisation") moves the conversation from price per ton to cost per tonne milled.

Competitive Position

Two arenas: mill liners and wear (vs Metso, Weir, FLSmidth, ME Elecmetal, Polycorp, Multotec) and grinding media (vs AIA Engineering, Magotteaux, ME Elecmetal, Chinese producers)

Market position

Peer comparison (12 Oct 2026; peers from stockanalysis.com and Screener.in)

CompanyRevenue (TTM)GrowthEBITDA %PAT %RoEP/E (trail / fwd)EV/EBITDAMoat
Tega (pro-forma)₹3,059 Cr TTM reported; ~₹16,000 Cr pro-forma [Est.]FY26 +3%~14% group (Q1 adj ex-OI)neg. (Q1)5.9%n.m. / 29.1~12.1x LTM PF [Est.]Bespoke liners plus a leading forged-media franchise
AIA Engineering (India)₹4,549 CrFY26 +3%28–29%~28%17.0%27.7 / n.a.~24x [Est.]Hi-chrome castings leader, net cash
Weir Group (UK)£2.64 bn3-yr fcst 6.8%19.8%n.a.13.9%26.0 / 19.014.9xSlurry pumps, Vulco liners, ESCO GET
Metso (Finland)€5.36 bn3-yr fcst 8.1%16.2%n.a.20.0%28.1 / 20.816.6xFull flowsheet plus Poly-Met/Megaliner
FLSmidth (Denmark)DKK 14.75 bnn.a.16.1%n.a.15.1%20.2 / 17.113.1xMining aftermarket, mill liners

AIA EV/EBITDA = (mcap ₹35,093 Cr − investments ₹4,302 Cr) ÷ FY26 operating profit ₹1,261 Cr. Private peers (Magotteaux/Sigdo Koppers, ME Elecmetal, Polycorp, Multotec, Trelleborg mining) are not covered: no verified data this session. Tega's trailing P/E is not meaningful after the Q1 loss (stockanalysis shows 688x).

Strengths and weaknesses vs each peer [Analyst View]

vs.Tega's edgeTega's gap
AIA EngineeringForged SAG media and polymer liners, which AIA lacks. Local plants in the Americas and Indonesia, compared with AIA's export model exposed to anti-dumping duties.AIA has ~2x Tega's legacy margins, net cash, and hi-chrome scale. Molycop's hi-chrome capacity is sub-scale (~20kt own).
Weir / Metso / FLSmidthPure-play consumables. Cheaper cost base in India. Molycop gives scale in media that the OEMs largely do not make.The OEMs own mill and equipment design (installed base), have balance-sheet strength and broad service networks, and earn far higher RoE.
Chinese media producersLocal supply, service and SAG-ball metallurgy. US tariffs act as a barrier.Price pressure in LatAm forged media (raised Aug-26; not quantified).

Industry structure and Porter's five forces

  • Structure: liners are an oligopoly of global OEMs plus specialists. Grinding media is consolidated in the West (Molycop, Magotteaux, ME Elecmetal, AIA) and fragmented in China.
  • Barriers to entry: mine qualification trials, design IP, local plants, safety records. These are high for liners and medium for forged media.
  • Moat durability: durable as long as ore grades keep falling, because more tonnes must be milled per unit of metal and consumables demand rises.
  • Buyer power: high. Large miners run global tenders.
  • Supplier power: medium. Steel and rubber are indexed or passed through.
  • Threat of substitutes: low to medium. Hi-chrome replaces small forged balls in Africa and Australia, and polymer replaces steel liners, which Tega gains from.
  • New entrants: low in liners, medium in media (Chinese).
  • Rivalry: moderate. Competition is on cost per tonne milled.

Risks & Red Flags

Risk register: severity reflects the post-Molycop company
RiskCategorySeverityExplanationMitigant
Leverage and covenant/rating headroomFinancialHigh~₹11,200 Cr of gross debt including preference shares; ~4.7–5.3x pro-forma EBITDA. CRISIL downgrade trigger is >4.25x. Molycop's June finance cost was ₹97 Cr.Apollo preference money cut senior debt. Non-core asset sales (>US$70 mn). Strong liquidity. Upstream dividends.
Equity dilutionGovernance / FinancialHighEnabling ₹4,000 Cr raise. CRISIL cites fresh equity to deleverage within 18–20 months. ₹95 Cr allotment to AP Jupiter pending.Pricing likely at or near market; the promoter has participated before.
Integration and synergy deliveryExecutionHighAn acquired business ~8x Tega's size, different culture (US PE-owned), HQ relocation plans, and a 26-plant network.Phased approach; Molycop COO and CFO retained; Apollo aligned.
Goodwill impairmentFinancialMedium~₹5,000 Cr provisional goodwill. A key audit matter already exists on Tega Holdings Pte.Purchase multiple ~7.6x EBITDA is low versus peers.
Mining cycle / mine closuresMacroMediumConsumables track ore throughput, not metal price, but mine closures (Cobre Panama, Grasberg) cut Molycop volume ~1.6%. Equipment is capex-cyclical.~98% recurring revenue. Copper and gold prices near records support throughput.
Steel and rubber price volatilityBusinessMediumBar is ~80% of Molycop COGS; rubber and PU for Tega.~85% steel-indexed contracts; pass-through with ~1-quarter lag.
Chinese competition in forged mediaBusinessMediumRaised by analysts for LatAm.Local plants, service, SAG-ball leadership, tariff barriers.
Hi-chrome substitutionTechnologyMediumHi-chrome replaces smaller forged balls in Africa and Australia.Molycop's own hi-chrome (62kt supplied, 200kt goal).
Guidance credibility / CFO churnGovernanceMediumThree CFOs; consumables guidance misses; Chile COD pushed from ~Aug-26 to Mar-27.New CFO from 6 Aug 2026; separate three-segment reporting promised.
Preference shares and earn-out seniorityFinancialMediumCumulative, above-market coupon (undisclosed) on ~US$270 mn; US$120 mn earn-out in FY28.The earn-out pays only if the mine-restart EBITDA arrives.
FX and upstreamingMacroMedium80–85% of revenue in FX. INR parent debt is serviced by USD subsidiaries.Natural hedge; Molycop hedging programme.
Logistics and geopolitics (Middle East shipping)MacroMediumFY26 consumables flat partly on container and vessel shortages.Local plants (Chile, South Africa, Molycop network).
Chile plant regulatory delaysExecutionLowCommercial production now Mar-27, subject to local approvals.Interim alternate Chilean plants keep capacity unconstrained (management).
Key-person dependenceGovernanceMediumMehul Mohanka drives strategy and the deals. Chairman is 50 years in.Board and senior-management succession policy exists.
Interest ratesMacroMediumFloating-rate Molycop and parent debt. Indian rate hikes are signalled for Oct/Dec 2026 (ICRA research banner, unverified).Expected 20–30 bp spread improvement after the refinancing.
Tax / litigationRegulatoryLowStandalone contingent liabilities of ~₹9 Cr (mainly income tax).Immaterial.
ESG / safetyESGLowForging and rubber curing are energy-intensive; mining-linked.Target −20% Scope 1+2 by FY30; ZLD at Dahej; liner recycling.
Red-flag checklist

Rising debt: YES. Margin deterioration: FY26 yes, Q1 FY27 partial recovery. Auditor concerns: no (one key audit matter only). RPT abuse: no. Promoter selling: no (only for public-shareholding compliance in FY24). Dilution: YES, plus overhang. Customer losses: Molycop mine closures. Pledge: nil.

Concall Highlights & Guidance

Six results calls plus the Molycop deal call (12 Sep 2025). Transcripts filed on BSE.
CallKey highlightsTone
Q4 FY25
May 2025
CFO Khaitan
FY25 income ₹1,681.8 Cr (+11%), EBITDA 23%. Order book ₹1,029 Cr (₹591 Cr within 12 months). Consumables +11% vs the 15% guide, called a "deferment". Chile capex US$30–35 mn. Equipment Q4 +35%.Confident
Q1 FY26
Aug 2025
Total income ₹371.6 Cr (revenue from ops ₹356 Cr), EBITDA ₹72.5 Cr (20%). Equipment +78%. Order book ₹1,005 Cr. "On track to achieve FY26 guidance". Chile commercial production "around same time next year". DynaPrime growth guided at 15–20%+.Confident
Molycop deal call
12 Sep 2025
EV US$1.48 bn. Tega equity US$361 mn (US$110 mn debt plus US$250–260 mn equity raise). Apollo ~23% plus perpetual preference shares. Debt cut from US$1.0 bn to US$780 mn. Net debt/EBITDA <2.5x in four years. Margin 11.5% → 15%. Synergies US$20 mn (year 2) → US$30 mn (year 4). ROE 18%. FY25 Molycop EBITDA US$173 mn, FCF ~US$50 mn. 83% gold and copper.Expansive
Q2 FY26
Nov 2025
Total income ₹421.1 Cr (+15%; revenue from ops ₹405 Cr), EBITDA 20%. H1 consumables only +3%, but management "committed to full year". Equipment margin 14%. Chile commercial production "Q2 FY27". ₹2,000 Cr capital raise noted.Confident, defensive on consumables
Q3 FY26
Feb 2026
9M EBITDA 18% (one-offs). Consumables FY26 cut to ~8%; equipment 28–30%. Stake raised to 84%. Closing expected by 31 Mar. Industry growth ~4.9%.Cautious
Q4 FY26
2 Jun 2026
Interim CFO Ganguly
FY26 income ₹1,773.6 Cr (+5%); adj. EBITDA ₹396.7 Cr (22% incl. other income). Consumables flat (Middle East logistics; ~₹50 Cr finished goods stuck). Order book ₹1,206 Cr (+18%). Molycop closed 1 Jun. Debt taken over US$838 mn; parent debt ₹1,500 Cr. Leverage target now 3x in 3–4 years. Molycop FY27 growth ~3% (mine restarts pushed to FY28). Q1 one-offs ~US$30 mn flagged. FY27 guidance: consumables 15%, equipment 25% at 12–13% margin, blended 21–22% ex-Molycop.Defensive
Q1 FY27
13 Aug 2026
CFO Joshi (new)
Group revenue ₹1,723 Cr; adj. EBITDA ₹264 Cr (15%); one-offs ₹191 Cr. Legacy revenue +21%; consumables +36% at 24.1% margin; equipment −44%. Molycop June revenue ₹1,292 Cr, EBITDA ₹163 Cr (+3% YoY), "directionally ahead". Goodwill ~₹5,000 Cr provisional. Molycop net debt US$672.5 mn. Group debt ₹11,200 Cr incl. ₹2,600 Cr preference. Synergies US$20 mn in 2–2.5 years; cross-sell from Q3–Q4. Chile soft start Jan-27, commercial Mar-27. FY27 consolidated margin "~15%".Upbeat, early

Management in their own words

"We're maintaining our guidance of about 15% CAGR on the consumables." (Mehul Mohanka, Q1 FY27)

"It would be premature to draw conclusions regarding the full year outlook based on this number of Molycop." (CFO Ravi Joshi, Q1 FY27)

"Our very primary focus will be to bring down the debt in the next 3 years to a level wherein 3x of leverage." (Himanshu Raijada, Q4 FY26)

"Around 85% of our contracts have a movement based on steel indexes." (Lance Dawber, Molycop COO, Q1 FY27)

"I'd like to begin by assuring all investors… that the debt at Molycop level carries no recourse to Tega Industries." (Mehul Mohanka, Sep-25 deal call)

Analyst Q&A that reveals risk

Guidance vs. outcome (credibility ledger)

GuidanceGivenOutcomeVerdict
Consumables +15% FY26May/Aug/Nov-25~0% (₹1,434 Cr vs ₹1,430 Cr)Missed
Consumables ~8% FY26 (revised)Feb-26~0%Missed
Equipment +25% FY26May-25+24.6%Met
Group EBITDA 21–22% (ex one-offs)FY2622% incl. OI; 18.6% ex OIMet only incl. OI
Chile commercial productionAug-25: ~Aug-26 → Nov-25/Feb-26: Q2 FY27 → Jun-26: Q3–Q4 → Aug-26: Mar-27PendingSlipped ~7 months
Molycop closingSep-25: Dec-25/Jan-26 → Feb-26: by 31 Mar1 Jun 2026Late
LeverageSep-25: net <2.5x in 4 yearsJun-26: 3x in 3–4 yearsLoosened
Order book growthOngoing₹1,029 Cr → ₹1,231 Cr (Mar-25 → Jun-26)Delivered
1,0291,0051,1561,1401,2061,231 Mar-25Jun-25Sep-25Dec-25Mar-26Jun-26
Consumables and equipment order book, ₹ Cr. The 12-month-executable portion rose from ₹591 Cr to ~₹960 Cr. Molycop is excluded.

Tone over time: confident (FY25) → expansive (deal) → cautious (Feb-26) → defensive (Jun-26) → upbeat but hedged (Aug-26). Recurring themes: 15% CAGR, "timing" of orders, logistics, Chile. Contradictions: one-off totals, the stake (77% → 84.18%), the Molycop growth outlook, and the leverage target.

Growth, Outlook & Valuation

All forward numbers are estimates or management guidance; tagged accordingly

Revenue visibility

Order book (Jun-26)
₹1,231 Cr
+22% YoY; ~₹960 Cr within 12 months [Fact]
Order book ÷ LTM revenue (legacy)
~0.7x
Order book ÷ LTM legacy revenue ~₹1,765 Cr [Est.]
Molycop contracted
~85%
Of contracts steel-indexed; tenor not disclosed
Recurring share
~98%
Q1 FY27 consumables plus media [Est.]

Expansion and catalysts

Next 12 months

  • Q2 FY27 results (~Nov 2026): first full Molycop quarter, the true finance cost, minority share and PAT.
  • Final purchase price allocation (within 12 months of 1 Jun 2026); amortisation of intangibles.
  • Chile plant: soft start Jan-27, commercial production Mar-27.
  • Equipment aggregates product with a Japanese partner, Q3 FY27. Execution of TMML's ₹126 Cr Kalpataru Projects order (signed Sep-26, 14 months).
  • Cross-sell numbers from Q3–Q4 FY27. Non-core land sales (>US$70–75 mn).
  • Possible QIP under the ₹4,000 Cr enabling resolution. AP Jupiter allotment.

3–5 years

  • Cobre Panama restart (stockpile processing approved Apr-26) and Grasberg back to full output by end-CY27 → volume upside and the US$120 mn earn-out.
  • Hi-chrome from 62kt to 200kt.
  • Synergies of US$20 mn → US$30 mn; Molycop margin to 15–17%.
  • Deleveraging to ≤3x debt/EBITDA (CRISIL upgrade trigger <3x).
  • Falling ore grades and electrification-driven copper demand.

Guidance summary

MetricGuidanceSource
Consumables revenue15% CAGR (long term)Q1 FY27 call
Equipment revenue / margin~25% / 12–13%Q4 FY26 call
Legacy blended EBITDA (incl. OI)21–22%Q4 FY26 call
Consolidated EBITDA margin FY27~15%Q1 FY27 call
Molycop (Jun-26 to Mar-27, 10 months)Volume +~5%, EBITDA +~4%; capex ~US$28 mnQ1 FY27 call
SynergiesUS$20 mn in 2–2.5 yearsQ1 FY27 call
Capex FY27Tega ~US$40 mn incl. Chile; Molycop US$28 mnQ1 FY27 call
Leverage3x in 3–4 yearsQ4 FY26 call

Valuation

Pro-forma EV build [Est.]₹ Cr
Market cap at ₹1,908 × 7.51 Cr shares14,338
+ Molycop net debt (US$672.5 mn)6,366
+ Parent acquisition loan1,500
+ Legacy Tega other debt less cash (approx.)~100
+ Apollo preference shares (100% as debt)~2,500
+ Apollo 15.82% common minority (at cost US$74 mn)~690
Pro-forma EV~25,500
+ Contingent earn-out US$120 mn (if triggered)~1,130
Pro-forma LTM EBITDA (Molycop US$191 mn + Tega ₹315 Cr ex-OI)~2,110
EV / LTM EBITDA~12.1x (12.6x incl. earn-out)
Deal multiple paid for Molycop: US$1.455 bn ÷ US$191 mn LTM (÷ US$173 mn FY25)7.6x (8.4x)

The stockanalysis EV of ₹12,376 Cr (EV/EBITDA 33x) is stale: it uses the FY26 balance sheet with parked cash and excludes Molycop debt. Do not use it.

EPS bridge: why the P/E debate matters [Est.]
  • Legacy Tega FY27E PAT ~₹145–150 Cr. This assumes ex-OI EBITDA ₹362 Cr (+15%), normal other income ~₹40 Cr, D&A ~₹100 Cr, and interest at the new CFO's guided ₹110–120 Cr for the year, since the ₹1,500 Cr acquisition loan was undrawn at 31 Mar. Tax at 25%.
  • Case A, June as run-rate. Molycop finance cost stays ~₹97 Cr/month (≈US$10.3 mn). Adj. PAT ₹10.3 Cr × 12 ≈ ₹124 Cr, of which 84.18% is attributable ≈ ₹104 Cr. Group ≈ ₹250 Cr ÷ 7.56 Cr shares ≈ ₹33 EPS, ~58x P/E.
  • Case B, guided debt service. Patrick Koley guided ~US$70 mn of interest plus principal over 10 months, ≤US$7 mn/month, so June's ~US$10 mn likely included a preference accrual or one-off fee amortisation. This case assumes an all-in recurring finance cost of ~₹57 Cr/month (≈US$6 mn, within the ≤US$7 mn/month interest-plus-principal guide), which lifts Molycop pre-tax by ~₹40 Cr/month versus June. Molycop pre-tax would then be ~₹57 Cr/month (₹683 Cr a year). At ~30% tax and 84.18% ownership that is ~₹400 Cr attributable, a group total of ~₹550 Cr, and ~₹70–73 EPS, ~26–27x P/E, close to consensus. Sensitivity: if the undisclosed preference coupon (~12% on ~₹2,500 Cr ≈ ₹25 Cr/month) sits on top of ~₹45 Cr/month of interest, all-in cost is ~₹70 Cr/month and EPS falls to roughly ₹60 (~32x).
  • Consensus forward P/E of 29.1x implies ~₹65 EPS. The market is pricing Case B. The gap between A and B (~₹37–40/share of EPS) depends almost entirely on the undisclosed preference coupon and on how much of June's finance cost was one-off. Q2 FY27 (first full quarter) will show which case holds.

Multiples vs history and peers

MetricTega nowTega 3-yr contextPeer range
P/E (forward consensus)29.1xFY24–FY25 trailing ~45–60x on ₹29–30 EPS at ₹1,400–1,900 prices [Est.]17–21x (global fwd); AIA 27.7x trailing
P/B4.2x (book ₹454)Higher pre-raise–
EV/EBITDA (pro-forma LTM)~12.1xLegacy traded ~25–30x+ [Est.]13–17x global; ~24x AIA
Dividend yield0.10% (₹2 DPS)Flat at ₹2AIA 0.43%
BuybacksNone ever––

A precise 3-year average P/E and EV/EBITDA history was not retrievable without paid data [Gap]. Ranges are computed from reported EPS and the 52-week and 3-year price range.

Scenario targets (12–18 months) [Est.]

ScenarioAssumptionsFY28E EBITDAMultipleNet debt + minority + earn-outValue / share
BullConsumables 15%+, Chile on time, Molycop 15% margin, mines restart, finance cost normalises~₹2,600 Cr13x~₹10,200 Cr~₹3,100
BaseConsumables ~12%, Molycop +4% plus half of synergies, slow deleveraging~₹2,450 Cr11x~₹11,060 Cr~₹2,100
BearMolycop volume flat, China pricing, rating pressure, QIP at a discount~₹2,150 Cr9x~₹12,130 Cr~₹955
Probability-weighted (25/50/25)~₹2,060 (+8%)

Sell-side: 4 analysts, average target ₹1,799 ("Hold") per stockanalysis.com. A Simply Wall St consensus of ₹1,914 (range ₹1,714–2,030) is undated. Named brokerages are not verified [Gap]. Equity value is highly geared to EBITDA because of the leverage: each 1x turn of multiple ≈ ₹320/share.

Final Verdict

Aamara Capital internal view as of 12 Oct 2026 [Analyst View]
Business Quality
Strong
Critical-to-operate consumables; ~98% recurring
Management Quality
Medium
Bold allocator; weak forecasting; CFO churn
Financial Quality
Weak
~5x debt/EBITDA; thin Molycop PAT; rating cut
Valuation
Fair
Cheap on EV/EBITDA; P/E 26–58x depending on finance cost
Overall View
Neutral
Wait for the first full Molycop quarter

Bull case

  1. Bought a global grinding-media leader at ~7.6x EBITDA. Synergies (US$20–30 mn) and mine restarts could lift Molycop EBITDA 20%+ without large capex.
  2. Cross-selling liners into 400+ Molycop mines makes legacy consumables growth >15% durable, with the Chile plant adding LatAm capacity.
  3. Deleveraging (FCF, land sales) shifts value from debt to equity, so each 1x of leverage reduction adds roughly ₹250–300/share.

Bear case

  1. Molycop's below-EBITDA costs (debt plus a cumulative, above-market preference coupon) leave common shareholders a few hundred crore of PAT for years. The P/E is ~58x if June's finance cost is the run-rate.
  2. Dilutive QIP under the ₹4,000 Cr enabling resolution at or below market, as CRISIL flags.
  3. Forged-media commoditisation (Chinese competition, hi-chrome substitution) plus a legacy business that keeps missing 15%.

Base case (12–18 months)

Consumables grow ~12%, Molycop EBITDA +4–6% with early synergies, and the group EBITDA margin sits ~14–15%. Debt/EBITDA drifts to ~4x by FY28. Some equity is raised. The stock tracks the ₹1,800–2,200 range, with fair value ~₹2,100.

Five things to remember

  1. Tega is now ~85–90% a grinding-media company. Analyse it as Molycop plus a high-margin liner business.
  2. Company "EBITDA" includes other income. FY26 other income was inflated by parked preferential-issue proceeds that are now deployed.
  3. Group debt is ₹11,200 Cr including ~₹2,600 Cr of Apollo preference shares, plus a US$120 mn earn-out due FY28.
  4. Q1 FY27: legacy operating EBITDA +36% YoY; Molycop June adj. PAT was only ₹10 Cr on ₹1,292 Cr of revenue.
  5. Promoters are the Mohanka family (nil pledge). TA Associates exited fully in the 2021 IPO. Apollo is now the key financial partner at the Molycop level.

Five questions to ask before investing

  1. What is the coupon, dividend policy and redemption mechanics of Apollo's ~US$270 mn preference shares, and how much of June's ₹97 Cr Molycop finance cost is recurring?
  2. How much equity will be raised under the ₹4,000 Cr enabling resolution, at what price, and when?
  3. What are Molycop's quarterly volume, EBITDA per ton and hi-chrome mix, and how much revenue is at risk from Chinese forged media in LatAm?
  4. Why did three CFOs serve in a year, and what controls cover a 26-plant multinational now consolidated from Kolkata?
  5. What is the final purchase price allocation (intangible amortisation versus goodwill), and what are the exact conditions for the US$120 mn earn-out?
Tega has bought a world-class, cash-generative grinding-media franchise at a sensible EBITDA multiple. Its capital structure, though, means minority shareholders will see little of that cash for two to three years, and management's forecasting record argues for proof before paying up. Neutral, fair value ~₹2,100; would turn constructive below ~₹1,600 or on evidence of Molycop finance costs below ₹50 Cr/month.

Sources

All accessed 12 Oct 2026 unless stated. A research audit trail is in Tega-Research-NOTES.md (Downloads).

Company filings and reports

Concall transcripts (BSE)

Financial databases and market data

Credit ratings

News and secondary

Known data gaps