NSE: PTCIL · BSE: 539006 · ISIN-listed equity, face value ₹10 · Aerospace & Defence — titanium/superalloy materials, precision castings, forgings, machining · Not to be confused with PTC India Ltd (power trading)
FY26 Revenue from ops
₹602.8 Cr
+95.7% YoY · total income ₹643.3 Cr [Fact]
FY26 PAT
₹101.6 Cr
+66.4% YoY · EPS ₹67.76 [Fact]
FY26 EBITDA margin
22.2%
core ex other income, ₹134 Cr on Screener basis (₹131.8 Cr / 21.9% on company total-income basis: 172.3 − OI 40.5) [Est.]; company-reported 26.8% incl. other income [Fact]
FY26 RoE / RoCE
7.0% / 8.0%
company definitions (placement doc) [Fact]
Market data
Item
Value
CMP (NSE)
₹25,339 — Screener.in, 12 Oct 2026, 12:40 pm IST (+3.23% on day) [Fact]
AMTC Lucknow · Mehsana (Gujarat) · SMTC, UP Defence Corridor, Lucknow (Aerolloy) · Crewe, UK (Trac) [Fact]
Employees
720 permanent (incl. 145 trainees) at standalone level, 31 Mar 2026; group headcount not disclosed [Fact]
Auditor
S. N. Dhawan & Co LLP (appointed at 60th AGM, 2023, for 5 yrs); FY26 report unqualified [Fact]
Credit rating
ICRA A (Stable) / A1 — upgraded 27 Mar 2026 [Fact]
Sector
Aerospace & defence materials and components; legacy industrial castings
What the company does — in plain English
PTC Industries is a 63-year-old Lucknow foundry that is turning itself into India’s only vertically integrated titanium and nickel-superalloy house. The legacy business (standalone PTC, about ₹290 Cr revenue in FY26) makes investment castings — pump casings, valves, impellers, marine and defence parts — mostly for export. The growth business sits in the wholly owned subsidiary Aerolloy Technologies, which since 2025 operates vacuum arc remelting (VAR), vacuum induction melting (VIM) and plasma arc melting (PAM) furnaces and a 4,500/5,100-tonne open-die forging press at the Strategic Materials Technology Complex (SMTC) in the Lucknow node of the UP Defence Industrial Corridor; an electron-beam cold-hearth remelting (EBCHR) furnace and rolling mills are still being commissioned. Aerolloy melts titanium sponge and scrap into aerospace-grade ingots and turns them into castings, forgings and (soon) plates and sheets for Airbus, Safran, Honeywell, Dassault, BAE Systems, Blue Origin, BrahMos, DRDO and ISRO. A December 2024 UK acquisition, Trac Precision Solutions, adds machining of hot-section turbine blades and vanes for Rolls-Royce, Safran, GE and Siemens programmes. [Fact]
Quick verdict scorecard
Business
Strong
Management
Medium
Financial
Weak
Valuation
Expensive
Overall
Neutral
Bottom line
A rare, hard-to-replicate strategic-materials platform with credible global customer validation, priced at ~320x trailing earnings and ~62x the only published FY28 broker estimate (after re-basing for the new shares), with operating cash flow negative in two of the last five years (FY24, FY26) and cumulatively negative (−₹79 Cr) over FY22–FY26. The business is real; the price already assumes the execution. [Analyst View]
Data freshness: price/market data Screener.in 12 Oct 2026 (12:40 pm IST); financials to Q1 FY27 (quarter ended 30 Jun 2026); QIP placement document dated 9 Oct 2026; QIP allotment corrigendum 10 Oct 2026. All ₹ Cr unless stated. Fiscal year ends 31 March.
Analyst Notes
The editorial read before the data. First-person, opinionated, numerate. [Analyst View]
What just happened. FY26 was the year the SMTC stopped being a slide and started being a plant. Consolidated revenue roughly doubled to ₹603 Cr and PAT rose 66% to ₹102 Cr, but look at where it came from: Trac (bought for ₹181 Cr in Dec 2024) contributed about ₹247 Cr of total income (pre inter-company elimination) at only ~6% EBITDA, Aerolloy tripled to ₹190 Cr of total income at a 47% EBITDA margin and ₹68 Cr of PAT, and the legacy standalone business actually shrank its PAT by 6% to ₹33 Cr. Q4 FY26 was spectacular (company-reported EBITDA margin 35.6%, PAT ₹60 Cr); Q1 FY27 normalised (27.5%, PAT ₹29 Cr) as Aerolloy’s total income fell ~25% QoQ from ~₹99 Cr to ₹74 Cr. The inflection is genuine but lumpy — development and first-article orders are being billed in bunches.
What the market is pricing. At ₹25,339 the company is worth ~₹40,150 Cr on the post-QIP share count — about 320x trailing PAT, ~58x trailing revenue and ~12x post-QIP book. The stock trades above the ₹21,060 QIP price fixed on 9 Oct 2026 and above ICICI Securities’ ₹21,500 target (2 Jun 2026; 50x FY28E EPS). Re-basing I-Sec’s FY28E PAT of ₹645 Cr to 1.585 Cr shares gives EPS of ~₹407, so the stock is already at ~62x a two-year-forward estimate that itself assumes revenue more than triples from FY26 to ₹2,187 Cr. The market is paying today for FY29–FY31 earnings from Airbus, Safran LEAP, Honeywell and Blue Origin programmes that are mostly still in qualification.
Why the business deserves a premium. The moat is real: aerospace titanium and superalloy castings need multi-year customer qualification, NADCAP special-process approvals and CEMILAC airworthiness clearances; very few companies outside the US, France, Russia and China can melt aerospace-grade titanium. PTC now holds VAR, VIM, PAM and a large open-die press on one site, has LTAs with Dassault (Rafale/Falcon, Jan 2024), Safran (seven LEAP-1A/1B castings, Mar 2025), Honeywell (2025) and Airbus (A320neo/A330neo/A350, Aug 2026), and is moving into sub-systems (BrahMos airframe system, ARDE titanium cradle). The Q1 FY27 Aerolloy EBITDA margin of 45% shows what qualified product earns. Global titanium supply is concentrated in China and Russia, and Western primes want alternatives — a structural tailwind.
What tempers the enthusiasm (1): cash. Reported profits have not turned into cash. Cumulative PAT FY22–FY26 was ~₹244 Cr; cumulative operating cash flow was negative ~₹79 Cr, and free cash flow was about −₹827 Cr. FY26 CFO was −₹69 Cr as receivables jumped ₹127 Cr and inventory ₹91 Cr; Screener’s cash conversion cycle is ~970 days. Management explains this as qualification-phase WIP (ingots, forgings and castings awaiting first-article approval), which is plausible for a melt-to-part business — but it means the company has funded itself almost entirely with shareholders’ money: about ₹2,910 Cr of equity raised since 2022 against ₹244 Cr of cumulative profit. Other income (mostly interest on QIP cash plus a ₹19 Cr FX gain) was ~30–32% of FY26 PBT (Screener ₹38 Cr vs company ₹40.5 Cr other income); the new ₹1,769 Cr of net proceeds will again inflate reported PAT through treasury income until deployed.
What tempers the enthusiasm (2): capital allocation and timelines. Of the October 2026 QIP’s ₹1,769 Cr net proceeds, ₹621 Cr is earmarked for “unidentified acquisitions” and ₹437 Cr for general corporate purposes — 60% with no named use. The EBCHR furnace was bought in August 2022 (second-hand, 5,000 tpa) and is still “under commissioning” in the October 2026 placement document; the hot rolling mill bought in August 2024 is still being installed; I-Sec had expected EBCHR in Q1 FY27. The original 2022 plan spoke of ~₹125 Cr over two years for Phase 1; actual group capex was ~₹117 Cr (FY24), ₹190 Cr (FY25) and ₹317 Cr (FY26), with another ₹499 Cr for Aerolloy and ₹146 Cr for Trac now planned. ICRA’s March 2026 note described a ~₹500 Cr FY26–28 capex funded by debt and accruals; its April 2026 Aerolloy rationale put the SMTC project at ~₹700 Cr, ~₹400 Cr already spent, ~₹300 Cr left to spend over FY27–28; the project funded partly by ~₹300 Cr of debt and partly by accruals/liquidity. Six months later the QIP earmarks ₹480 Cr (of a ₹499 Cr Aerolloy expansion) — more than the ~₹300 Cr ICRA understood to be outstanding — and shifts the funding from debt to equity. Whether this is the same programme re-funded, an enlarged scope, or both is not disclosed. [Analyst View]
How I would frame it. This is a high-quality, strategically important franchise in the middle of a capital-heavy build, owned by a promoter family that has executed ambitious technical projects but repeatedly chosen dilution at rising prices over balance-sheet discipline. The investment case is binary on qualification conversion: if Airbus/Safran/Honeywell parts move to serial production on schedule and EBCHR delivers cheap recycled titanium, FY29+ earnings could justify much of today’s value; if qualification slips 12–24 months (common in aerospace), the multiple has no support from current cash flows. I would want evidence of (a) positive operating cash flow for two consecutive half-years, (b) EBCHR and rolling-mill commissioning, (c) a disclosed order book, and (d) a named use for the ₹621 Cr acquisition kitty before paying ~62x two-year-forward earnings.
Read the rest of the report with these in mind
Aerolloy margins (45% EBITDA in Q1 FY27) and its quarterly run-rate (₹74–99 Cr) are the single best leading indicator.
Watch receivables + WIP vs revenue; cash conversion is the weakest link.
Separate core EBITDA from “EBITDA incl. other income” — the company headline uses the latter.
Finish5-axis machining; Trac UK hot-section finishing
→
CustomerOEM primes, DRDO labs, DPSUs, ISRO, space launch
Investment-casting stages: engineering & simulation → wax/foam/3D-printed patterns → robotic ceramic shell building → de-wax → melting & pouring (titanium under vacuum/inert gas; airfoils with controlled solidification for equiaxed/DS/SX structures) → knockout & fettling → heat treatment/HIP → NDT, metallurgical and mechanical testing → multi-axis CNC machining. Titanium casting operations began in 2015 — the first titanium investment castings made in India (D&B report commissioned by the company).
Facilities
Facility
Entity
Area (sq m)
Activities
Key equipment / status
AMTC, Lucknow (HQ)
PTC
65,758
Medium-to-large high-integrity investment castings (industrial, defence); development base for Ti/superalloy castings; R&D (DSIR-recognised); NABL lab
Robotic shell-coating, HIP, air-melt furnaces, 3D printing, CNC; 700 kW rooftop solar
Mehsana, Gujarat
PTC
74,588 (17-acre campus)
Small-to-medium investment castings & machined parts for oil & gas, LNG, marine, petrochem, pulp & paper
Robotic shelling, air melting, CNC; expansion announced FY26 (+50,000 sq ft shop floor, “multiple times” capacity)
SMTC, UP Defence Industrial Corridor, Lucknow node (~50 acres next to BrahMos facility)
VAR (commissioned; VAR-400 for large castings Sep 2025), VIM (Sep 2025), PAM (installed Jan 2026, ~600 tpa), 4,500/5,100 t open-die press (production Mar 2026); EBCHR under commissioning; rolling/plate mills under installation
Crewe, Cheshire, UK
Trac
3,716
Precision machining & finishing of Ti/superalloy castings, complex airfoils, IGT parts
Plant inauguration: Titanium & Superalloy Materials Plant inaugurated 11 May 2025 by Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh and UP CM Yogi Adityanath; “Lokarpan” (dedication) 18 Oct 2025, when the GTRE single-crystal blade order was announced. First titanium ingot produced in-house without foreign expert supervision during FY26. [Fact]
Second-hand melt shop
Equipment provenance matters for both cost and risk: the VAR (agreement 25 Mar 2021, 1,500 tpa, up to 1 m dia / 12 t ingots) and EBCHR (agreement 6 Jul 2022, 5,000 tpa, ingots/slabs up to 12 t) were purchased as existing plant, with decommissioning, dismantling and re-installation by the original German OEM; the PAM was bought under a separate equipment purchase agreement (30 Jan 2023, origin not stated); the hot rolling mill (Aug 2024) was acquired from the USA. Management claimed in 2022 these were bought at “a fraction of original cost”, enabling a 10–15x revenue/asset multiple at full capacity. [Fact] Re-commissioning used vacuum-melt equipment has taken longer than first guided. [Analyst View]
Capacities (disclosed)
Asset
Capacity
Status (Oct 2026)
Source
VAR furnace (titanium ingots)
1,500 tpa
Operating
2022 press release; placement doc
EBCHR furnace (Ti scrap recycling)
5,000 tpa (claimed >15% of global EB/PAM recycled Ti)
Under commissioning (acquired Aug 2022)
2022 press release; placement doc
PAM furnace
~600 tpa
Installed Jan 2026; “entered production” FY26
Jan 2026 press release; AR FY26
Total Ti ingot capacity post-EBCHR
~6,500 tpa (I-Sec estimate incl. VAR)
—
ICICI Securities, 2 Jun 2026 [Est.]
Open-die forging press
4,500/5,100 t
Production from Mar 2026
Q4 FY26 presentation
RapidCast™ casting size
up to 6,000 kg per piece
Operating
Placement doc
Capacity utilisation
Not disclosed
—
Searched placement doc, AR FY26
Certifications & approvals
Certification
Scope
Issuer
Entity
ISO 9001:2015
QMS
TÜV NORD
PTC, Aerolloy
EN 9100:2018 / AS9100D
As-cast and machined investment castings in air & vacuum melt for steel, Ti, superalloys; multi-site incl. SMTC
TÜV NORD
Aerolloy
NADCAP
Heat treating/HIP, NDT, welding (all with merit), chemical processing
PRI
Aerolloy
ISO 14001 / ISO 45001
Environment / OH&S (Mehsana certified in FY26)
TÜV NORD
PTC, Aerolloy
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Information security, Lucknow
SGS
PTC
ISO/IEC 17025:2017
Testing lab at AMTC
NABL
PTC
PED 2014/68/EU; AD 2000-Merkblatt W0
Material manufacturer approval
TÜV NORD
PTC, Aerolloy
NORSOK M-650
Materials manufacturer qualification (oil & gas)
TÜV NORD
Aerolloy
ABS, Lloyd’s Register, Bureau Veritas
Marine castings approvals
Class societies
PTC
CEMILAC Letter of Approval (7 May 2025)
Military airworthiness — Ti-6Al-4V rear fin root fittings for AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft)
CEMILAC, DRDO
PTC
DSIR R&D recognition; DGAQA registration
In-house R&D unit; defence QA
DSIR; DGAQA
PTC
USP and moat
Integration under one roof: melting (VAR/VIM/PAM, EBCHR pending) + casting + forging + machining (Trac) — management claims Aerolloy is “one of only two companies in the world” able to make large investment castings in both titanium and superalloys after the VAR-400 commissioning (Sep 2025). [Fact] (company claim)
Qualification barriers: multi-year customer qualification cycles; NADCAP and CEMILAC approvals; “once a capability is qualified, additional parts are more incremental” (placement doc). [Fact]
Firsts in India: titanium investment castings (2015); robotic shell-coating (2007); first Indian company entrusted with post-cast operations on single-crystal ready-to-fit turbine blades (GTRE, Oct 2025); only Indian supplier of Ti/superalloy cast parts to Safran LEAP (Mar 2025). [Fact] (company/D&B claims)
Proprietary processes: RapidCast™ (DST-supported, up to 6 t castings without tooling), PrintCast™, ForgeCAST™, TiCast; Replicast® licensed. GreenTitanium™ recycling route planned on EBCHR. [Fact]
Policy alignment: PLI 1.2 (specialty steel — Ti alloys & superalloys) MoUs signed Feb 2026; Positive Indigenisation Lists; DIC location. [Fact]
Key customers (named in company disclosures)
Customer
Programme / product
Date
Status
Airbus
Fully machined ready-to-fit Ti castings — A320neo, A330neo, A350
Agreement 6 Aug 2026
Development → qualification → serial supply (value not disclosed)
Safran Aircraft Engines
Seven cast Ti/superalloy components for CFM LEAP-1A/1B
LTA order 28 Mar 2025
Serial-production progress cited in AR FY26; earlier MoUs 2021–25 incl. military engines
Honeywell Aerospace Technologies
Ti & superalloy castings incl. aero-engine parts; dedicated capacity
LTA FY26 (2025)
Value not disclosed
Dassault Aviation
Full range of Ti cast parts — Rafale & Falcon
LTPA 17 Jan 2024
Supply from 2024
BAE Systems
Ti castings for M777 ULH (spade trails, blades; saddle/cradle/lower carriage plan)
Agreement Oct 2022; production order 27 Sep 2024
Serial production
Blue Origin
Large Ni-superalloy LOX housings/manifolds for BE-4 (New Glenn)
Order Jan 2026*
Development & supply
BrahMos Aerospace
(i) Critical Ti castings ₹110 Cr over 24 months; (ii) strategic metallic airframe system & integration
(i) 21 Aug 2025; (ii) 17 Jul 2026
(ii) value not disclosed
GTRE (DRDO)
Post-cast ops for single-crystal ready-to-fit turbine blades
Oct 2025
Development
VSSC (ISRO)
Conversion of ~40 t Grade-1 sponge into double-VAR Ti-6Al-4V ingots
FY26 (Q3)
Order
ARDE (DRDO)
Design & development of Ti cradle for 105 mm Indian Light Tank
FY27 Q1
First design-led order
Gun Factory Kanpur
Development order, two major artillery gun components
FY27 Q1
Development
Israel Aerospace Industries
Ti cast aerospace components
Approval 2023; order 2024
Supply
Elbit, Kongsberg, Westad, Siemens Energy
Qualifications / progress to serial production (standalone)
*Blue Origin press release is dated “January 09, 2025” but is filed under 2026, references the Sep-2025 VIM commissioning and is reported in Q3 FY26 results — we treat the date as 9 Jan 2026 (typo in release). Rolls-Royce: relationship is via Trac’s hot-section work and the legacy Rolls-Royce Marine castings business (Total Cost Leadership Award) — no Aerolloy aero-engine contract with Rolls-Royce has been announced. [Analyst View]
Distribution, exports, IP
Direct sales only — no dealers or distributors; international BD led by Stephane Brans (Head of International Sales); Trac gives proximity to European OEMs. [Fact]
Exports: 81.8% of FY26 sale of products (EU 30.0%, UK 16.6%, US 11.1%, Norway 7.1%, RoW 16.3%); India share rose to 33.0% in Q1 FY27 (from 11.6% in Q1 FY26) on defence/space orders. See Supply Chain tab. [Fact]
Contracts: POs against RFQs, LTAs and development contracts; where feasible phased volumes, price indexation/raw-material pass-through, advances and milestone billing; export credit insurance used. [Fact]
IP: trademarks and proprietary/licensed processes; no patent count disclosed. CTO James Michael Collins (holds patents in investment casting and vacuum melting per AR). R&D team 45 professionals (30 Jun 2026). [Fact]
Awards: Raksha Mantri Excellence Award (2022), National Award for R&D in Industry (2006), TIME/Statista India Top-100 fastest growing (2026), FT/Statista Asia-Pacific high-growth (2026), Hurun India 500 (2025), Indo-French Cooperation of the Year 2025 (Aerolloy). [Fact]
Segment Analysis
The group reports a single Ind AS 108 segment (“manufacturing and selling of metal components for critical and super-critical applications”). Management describes three operating groups — Castings, Metals, Machining — but discloses numbers only by legal entity. We therefore use an entity bridge. [Fact]
Management’s three groups (qualitative)
Group
What it is
Customers
Entity
Castings Group
Air-melt industrial/defence castings; Ti & superalloy aerospace castings; equiaxed/DS/SX airfoils
Global OEMs, oil & gas, marine, defence
PTC standalone + Aerolloy
Metals Group
Ti & superalloy ingots/billets via VAR, PAM, (EBCHR); extending to open-die forging and rolling
Aerospace, defence, space (ISRO), internal feedstock
Revenue from ops ₹289.8 Cr (+19.4%); margins compressed by qualification costs
Aerolloy Technologies
190.4
+219.8%
89.5
47.0%
68.0 (+194.6%)
Revenue >₹175 Cr (+~210%); profit engine
Trac Precision (UK)
247.0
first full year
15.5
6.3%
~0.6 [Est.]
PAT not disclosed; residual after elimination
Sum of entities
764.3
172.6
Inter-company eliminations / consolidation adj.
~(121.0) [Est.]
~(0.3) [Est.]
Aerolloy supplies material/castings to PTC and vice versa
Consolidated
643.3
+88.0%
172.3
26.8%
101.6 (+66.4%)
Core EBITDA ex-OI ₹134 Cr (22.2% of revenue)
Entity bridge — Q1 FY27 vs Q1 FY26 (₹ Cr)
Entity
Q1 FY27 income
Q1 FY26 income
YoY
Q1 FY27 EBITDA
EBITDA %
Q1 FY27 PAT
Aerolloy
74.3
13.1
+466%
33.4
45.0%
22.1 (+323%)
Trac (UK)
71.4
n/d
—
6.1
8.5%
n/d
Standalone + eliminations (residual)
~51.4 [Est.]
~94.6 (incl. Trac) [Est.]
—
~14.7 [Est.]
~29% [Est.]
~7.1 [Est.]
Consolidated
197.1
107.7
+83.0%
54.2
27.5%
29.2 (+466%)
Residual = consolidated minus disclosed subsidiary figures; includes inter-company eliminations, so it understates true standalone revenue. Q1 FY26 Trac figures were not separately disclosed. [Est.]
Aerolloy — quarterly trajectory (₹ Cr, derived from cumulative disclosures)
% = share of revenue from operations as presented in placement document (table re-assembled from PDF; % basis per document). Note: regional % columns are on a mixed basis (some on revenue from operations, India/export totals on sale of products), so FY24/FY26 regional %s do not sum exactly. FY26 export total corrected in review to the sum of regions (₹489.6 Cr; = 81.8% of ₹598.3 Cr sale of products). [Fact]
Fastest grower and segment under pressure
Fastest grower
Aerolloy — FY26 total income +220%, Q1 FY27 +466% YoY, EBITDA margin 45–47%. Drivers: first full year of primary metals (VAR/VIM/PAM), Ti castings ramp for Dassault/Safran/BAE/IAI, development billings (BrahMos, GTRE, Blue Origin), domestic defence and ISRO. Management focus: SMTC commissioning (EBCHR, rolling), qualifications for Airbus/Honeywell/Safran, PLI 1.2. [Fact]
Under pressure
PTC standalone — FY26 EBITDA −6.9%, PAT −6.0% despite revenue +19.4%; operating margin fell from 22.8% to 16.9%, RoE 3.5%. Cause (per AR): material cost +40.9% and employee cost +24.3% from qualifying/stabilising new programmes. Trac — ~6% EBITDA on ₹247 Cr; capital-hungry (₹146 Cr expansion planned, ₹71 Cr from QIP). [Fact]
Financials: Profit & Loss
Consolidated, ₹ Cr. Annual and quarterly lines from Screener.in (consolidated) cross-checked to company filings and the QIP placement document. “Operating profit” = revenue less operating expenses, i.e. excluding other income; the company’s headline “EBITDA” includes other income. [Fact]
Five-year P&L
₹ Cr
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
TTM (Jun-26)
Revenue from operations
179
219
257
308
603
697
YoY growth
9.8%
22.3%
17.4%
19.9%
95.7%
~95% (TTM)
Gross margin (net material cost basis)
n/d
n/d
n/d
82.7%
82.4%
—
Operating expenses
137
161
184
233
468
526
Core EBITDA (ex other income)
42
59
73
75
134
172
Core EBITDA margin
23.5%
26.9%
28.4%
24.4%
22.2%
24.7%
Other income
5
7
13
33
38
35
Company-reported EBITDA (incl. OI)
n/d
n/d
86.0
109.4
172.3
207.1 [Est.]
margin on total income
—
—
31.8%
32.0%
26.8%
~28%
Depreciation
15
17
17
21
37
42
EBIT (PBT + interest)
32
50
69
87
136
166
EBIT margin
17.9%
22.8%
26.8%
28.2%
22.6%
23.8%
Interest
15
16
15
9
9
11
PBT
17
34
54
78
127
155
PBT margin
9.5%
15.5%
21.0%
25.3%
21.1%
22.2%
Tax rate
25%
23%
22%
22%
20%
—
PAT
13
26
42
61
102
126
PAT margin
7.3%
11.9%
16.3%
19.8%
16.9%
18.1%
EPS (₹, as reported)
9.78
19.29
29.24
40.72
67.74
83.78
Other income as % of PBT
29%
21%
24%
42%
30%
23%
FY21 for reference: revenue ₹163 Cr, PAT ₹4 Cr. 5-yr revenue CAGR 30%, 3-yr 40%; 5-yr PAT CAGR 102% (Screener). Margins computed on revenue from operations. TTM company-basis EBITDA = FY26 172.3 − Q1FY26 19.4 + Q1FY27 54.2. [Est.]
Quarterly P&L — last nine quarters
₹ Cr
Jun-24
Sep-24
Dec-24
Mar-25
Jun-25
Sep-25
Dec-25
Mar-26
Jun-26
Revenue
47
72
67
122
97
125
156
225
192
YoY
−35%
+24%
+22%
+69%
+106%
+74%
+133%
+84%
+98%
QoQ
−35%
+53%
−7%
+82%
−20%
+29%
+25%
+44%
−15%
Core EBITDA
10
21
15
29
9
26
25
73
49
Core EBITDA %
21%
29%
23%
24%
9%
21%
16%
32%
25%
Other income
4
8
10
11
11
8
10
12
5
Company EBITDA (incl. OI)
n/d
n/d
n/d
40.6
19.4
33.9 [Est.]
34.6 [Est.]
84.4
54.2
Interest
3
3
1
1
2
2
3
2
4
Depreciation
4
4
5
8
9
9
9
10
14
PBT
6
22
19
31
9
23
23
72
37
Tax %
23%
21%
24%
21%
43%
21%
18%
17%
21%
PAT
5
17
14
25
5
18
18
60
29
PAT YoY
—
—
—
+67%
+2%
+6%
+29%
+144%
+466%
EPS (₹)
3.39
11.56
9.50
16.40
3.44
12.11
12.24
39.96
19.47
Jun-24 YoY vs Jun-23 revenue ₹72 Cr. Q2/Q3 FY26 company EBITDA derived: H1 53.3 − Q1 19.4; 9M 87.9 − H1 53.3. I-Sec reports Q4 FY26 core EBITDA ₹72.6 Cr (32.2%) vs company 35.6% incl. OI — same gap. [Est.]
Growth decomposition
Driver
FY26 evidence
Type
Trac acquisition (Dec 2024)
~₹247 Cr total income in FY26 (first full year) vs ~4 months in FY25 (not separately disclosed)
Inorganic
Aerolloy ramp
Total income ₹59.5 Cr (FY25) → ₹190.4 Cr (FY26); first full year of primary metals; Ti castings
Organic — volume + new products
Standalone
Revenue +19.4% to ₹289.8 Cr; new qualifications (Siemens Energy, Elbit, Kongsberg, Westad, Safran, Honeywell)
Organic
Price vs volume
Not disclosed. Contracts allow raw-material pass-through/indexation where feasible
—
Organic vs inorganic
Roughly 40% of FY26 consolidated revenue came from the Trac acquisition (~₹247 Cr of total income vs ₹603 Cr revenue), so “revenue doubled” overstates organic growth. Organic growth (Aerolloy + standalone) is still strong, but closer to ~45–55% [Est.]. Q1 FY27 vs Q1 FY26 is like-for-like on perimeter (Trac consolidated in both), so the +98% YoY is largely organic — Aerolloy alone added ~₹61 Cr of income. [Analyst View]
One-time and non-core items
FY26 other income ₹40.5 Cr incl. net FX gain ₹19.0 Cr and bank interest ₹20.1 Cr (FY25: interest ₹26.5 Cr on QIP cash, FX ₹6.2 Cr). [Fact]
Q1 FY26 tax rate of 43% depressed PAT to ₹5.2 Cr — flatters the “+466% YoY” Q1 FY27 headline. [Fact]
Q1 FY27 “processing and work charges” jumped to ₹18.1 Cr from ₹2.7 Cr — new-product development spend. ESOP cost ₹1.07 Cr (vs ₹0.16 Cr). [Fact]
Interest on the Oct-2026 QIP cash (₹1,769 Cr) will add treasury income in H2 FY27–FY28 until deployed — strip this out when judging operating earnings. [Analyst View]
Earnings quality — are profits backed by cash?
₹ Cr
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
5-yr total
Q1 FY27
PAT
13
26
42
61
102
244
29
Cash from operations (CFO)
25
47
−96
14
−69
−79
44
CFO / PAT
1.9x
1.8x
−2.3x
0.2x
−0.7x
−0.3x
1.5x
CFO / core EBITDA
60%
80%
−132%
19%
−51%
—
90%
Divergence flag
Over FY22–FY26 the group reported ₹244 Cr of PAT and negative ₹79 Cr of operating cash flow. FY26 alone: operating profit before WC changes ₹137.2 Cr, then receivables +₹127.2 Cr, inventory +₹90.8 Cr, other assets +₹19.9 Cr → CFO −₹68.7 Cr. FY24 CFO (−₹96.3 Cr) was driven by a ₹106.3 Cr increase in other financial assets. Q1 FY27 turned positive (+₹44.2 Cr) on a ₹32 Cr fall in receivables. Management calls FY27 reversal “a priority”. Two consecutive positive half-years would be the first real proof that WIP is converting. [Fact]
Financials: Balance Sheet, Cash Flow & Ratios
Consolidated, ₹ Cr. Screener (aligned to FY22–FY26), FY26 annual report, QIP placement document (30 Jun 2026 and post-issue). [Fact]
Balance sheet summary
₹ Cr
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
30-Jun-26
Post-QIP (pro forma)
Share capital
5
13
14
15
15
15.0
15.8
Reserves
163
293
631
1,372
1,492
1,522.4
3,321.6 [Est.]
Net worth
168
306
645
1,387
1,507
1,537.4
3,337.4
Borrowings
196
177
182
61
261
274.0
~195 after ₹79 Cr repayment [Est.]
Other liabilities
61
70
68
136
188
n/d
—
Total assets
426
553
896
1,584
1,956
n/d
—
Net fixed assets (incl. intangibles, goodwill)
237
228
233
449
644
n/d
—
of which goodwill (Trac)
—
—
—
63.1
63.1
63.1
—
Capital WIP
23
67
159
185
311
n/d
—
Inventory
n/d
n/d
n/d
208.2
299.0
~239 (WIP+FG only) [Est.]
—
of which WIP
n/d
n/d
36.1
125.4
222.2
235.8
—
Trade receivables
n/d
n/d
n/d
143.8
273.9
~242 [Est.]
—
Cash & bank balances
n/d
n/d
n/d
381.8
136.6
~181 [Est.]
~1,950 [Est.]
Debt / equity (company)
—
—
0.28
0.04
0.17
0.18
0.08
FY24 WIP from FY25 opening (₹36.1 Cr). 30-Jun-26 receivables estimated from FY26 + Q1 decrease of ₹32 Cr; cash estimated from FY26 + Q1 net cash change and other-bank-balance movement. Post-QIP net worth from placement-document capitalisation statement (gross of issue expenses ~₹31 Cr). [Est.]
Cash flow (five years)
₹ Cr
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Q1 FY26
Q1 FY27
CFO
25
47
−96
14
−69
−35
44
Capex (PPE incl. capital advances)
~28 [Est.]
~96 [Est.]
116.5
190.0
317.3
81.4
87.6
Free cash flow (CFO − capex)
−3
−49
−213
−176
−386
−116
−43
CFI (total)
−28
−116
−60
−502
−271
−85
−47
CFF
3
74
284
544
185
38
10
of which equity raised (net)
n/d
n/d
295.6
676.4
0.3
0.0
0.0
Net change in cash
−1
6
127
55
−155
−81
7
FCF yield on current mkt cap
—
—
—
—
−1.0%
—
—
FY25 CFI includes ₹170.1 Cr “investments made” (Trac acquisition; standalone cost ₹181.2 Cr) and ₹168.8 Cr placed in bank deposits. Cumulative FY22–FY26 FCF ≈ −₹827 Cr, funded by ~₹1,110 Cr of equity raised FY23–FY25 and net debt. [Fact]/[Est.]
Working capital
Days
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Debtor days
125
109
158
170
166
Inventory days (on COGS, Screener)
541
521
440
1,423
1,030
Payable days
156
141
91
333
225
Cash conversion cycle
510
490
507
1,261
970
Working-capital days (on sales)
24
72
163
381
302
Company’s own Aerolloy working-capital assumptions (placement doc): FY26 inventory 238 days, receivables 132 days, other current assets 305 days (mostly unutilised input tax credit on imported plant and materials), payables only 28 days (sponge and master alloys imported against advance/LC). ICRA: working-capital intensity 75.6% (FY24) and 117.1% (FY25). Standalone debtor turnover 2.44x, inventory turnover 2.85x (FY26). [Fact]
Capex: history, plan and funding
Item
Amount
Source / status
2022 plan (VAR + EBCHR Phase 1)
~₹125 Cr over 2 years
Aug 2022 press release; to be funded by accruals, equity, debt incl. rights issue
₹499.3 Cr total (P&M ₹408.8 Cr; pre-op ₹40.9 Cr; contingency ₹49.6 Cr); ₹480 Cr from QIP
Chartered engineer certificate 9 Oct 2026; not appraised
QIP-funded: Trac expansion (UK)
₹146.3 Cr total (P&M ₹134.2 Cr); ₹71 Cr from QIP
Same
Asset turnover (sales / net fixed assets + CWIP)
FY24 0.66x · FY25 0.48x · FY26 0.63x [Est.]
Low — capacity built ahead of revenue
Maintenance vs growth capex
Not disclosed; overwhelmingly growth capex [Analyst View]
—
Capex credibility check
The capex story has been under-scoped and late: a ~₹125 Cr two-year plan in 2022 became ~₹624 Cr of capex in FY24–FY26 alone, plus another ~₹645 Cr now planned. The EBCHR (acquired Aug 2022) and rolling mill (acquired Aug 2024) were still not commissioned in Oct 2026. ICRA (Mar 2026) understood a ~₹500 Cr FY26–28 programme funded by debt and accruals; ICRA’s Aerolloy rationale (24 Apr 2026) described a ~₹700 Cr project with ~₹400 Cr already incurred and ~₹300 Cr of debt funding. The QIP now earmarks ₹551 Cr of equity for subsidiary capex (₹480 Cr Aerolloy, ₹71 Cr Trac); the Aerolloy portion alone exceeds the ~₹300 Cr ICRA saw as remaining. Investors should ask how much is re-funding of the existing programme versus new scope. [Analyst View]
₹80.5 Cr; ₹79.0 Cr to be repaid from QIP in FY27 [Fact]
Interest coverage (EBIT / interest, company)
FY24 5.2x · FY25 13.5x · FY26 39.0x · Q1 FY27 13.6x (company definition, placement doc) [Fact]. Caution: these do not reconcile with this report’s P&L (EBIT/interest ≈ 4.6x FY24, ~9.7x FY25, ~15x FY26) or with ICRA’s calculation (4.8x FY24, 8.6x FY25, 9.5x 9M FY26). Treat 39.0x as unverified. [Est.]
Finance cost trend
Q1 FY27 ₹3.6 Cr vs ₹1.7 Cr (term-loan interest ₹1.5 Cr vs ₹0.1 Cr as capex loans capitalise) [Fact]
Lenders (PTC standalone)
ICRA-rated facilities ₹355 Cr (LT term loan ₹10 Cr, LT fund-based ₹130 Cr, ST non-fund-based ₹215 Cr). Lender-wise (ICRA, as of 19 Mar 2026): State Bank of India — term loan ₹10 Cr, cash credit ₹40 Cr, non-fund ₹47.5 Cr; HDFC Bank — CC ₹30 Cr; YES Bank — CC ₹25 Cr, non-fund ₹23 Cr; Axis Bank — CC ₹25 Cr, non-fund ₹25 Cr; Punjab National Bank — CC ₹5 Cr, non-fund ₹17.5 Cr; ICICI Bank — overdraft ₹5 Cr, standby LC ₹70.6 Cr; proposed ₹31.4 Cr (total ₹355 Cr). Term loan coupon 8.45%, maturity Sep 2033 [Fact]
Aerolloy facilities (ICRA, 24 Apr 2026)
[ICRA]A (Stable)/A1 on ₹492 Cr: term loans ₹330 Cr (TL1 ₹60 Cr @ 8.10% and TL2 ₹80 Cr @ 8.00%, both Sep 2025–Mar 2035; TL3 ₹40 Cr @ 8.20%, Jul 2022–Mar 2032; ₹150 Cr proposed), cash credit ₹50 Cr, ST non-fund ₹112 Cr. Aerolloy’s individual lenders not named in sources accessed. ICRA takes a consolidated PTC + Aerolloy view [Fact]
Borrowing limit
Raised from ₹350 Cr to ₹600 Cr (s.180) by special resolution, EGM 1 Aug 2026; s.186 loans/investments/guarantees limit raised to ₹2,000 Cr (₹1,198.82 Cr outstanding at 31 Mar 2026, mostly to wholly owned subsidiaries) [Fact]
Contingent
Bank guarantees ₹87.5 Cr; disputed GST ₹0.17 Cr; corporate guarantees for subsidiaries’ loans [Fact]
Ratings
ICRA A (Stable)/A1, upgraded 27 Mar 2026 from A−(Stable)/A2+; Aerolloy ICRA A (Stable)/A1 assigned 24 Apr 2026; earlier CARE BBB+ (Stable)/A2 and Infomerics IVR BBB+ (Stable)/A2 (both since withdrawn at the company’s request — Infomerics Sep 2024, CARE May 2025). Downgrade trigger: DSCR <2.0x sustained [Fact]
ESOP overhang: 59,377 options outstanding under PTC-ESOS 2019 at ₹402 (0.37% of post-QIP equity); 4,701 vested-unexercised. No warrants, preference shares or convertibles outstanding. A new ESOP grant was approved by the NRC in Q4 FY26. Money raised since 2022 (~₹2,910 Cr) is ~12x cumulative FY22–FY26 PAT (₹244 Cr). Note the Aug-2022 rights issue at ₹10 (3:2) is the subject of the Raheja Leasing suit (Governance tab). [Fact]/[Est.]
Key balance-sheet risks
WIP-heavy inventory (₹222 Cr WIP at Mar-26, ₹236 Cr at Jun-26) tied to qualification programmes — write-down risk if parts fail first-article or programmes are re-specified. [Analyst View]
Receivables nearly doubled in FY26 (₹274 Cr) because sales bunched in Q4; ECL provision only ₹0.23 Cr. [Fact]
Goodwill ₹63 Cr on Trac, a ~6% EBITDA business — impairment test sensitivity. [Analyst View]
Unutilised input tax credit on imported plant (305 days of Aerolloy revenue as other current assets). [Fact]
Post-QIP the balance sheet is net cash (~₹1,750 Cr+) — solvency is not the issue; return on capital is. RoE 7.0% (FY26). [Est.]
Chairman & MD since 1998 Board entry; also CMD of Aerolloy and Chairman of Trac Precision; re-appointed 5 yrs from 1 Oct 2025
MBA (Operations), University of Tulsa; MSc Finance, Boston College. 28 yrs with company. Member, CII National Council; past Chairman SIDM UP chapter; Chairman SIDM Aerospace Committee. Holds 19.05% directly (plus Sachin Agarwal HUF). Belongs to the founding Agarwal family (founder: late Satish Chandra Agarwal); exact relationship not stated in filings reviewed
Smita Agarwal (b. 1976)
Whole-time Director & CFO (Board since Jun 2019; with company since 2014)
Chartered Accountant; ex-PwC, Coopers & Lybrand London; DISA (ICAI). Spouse of Sachin Agarwal. Leads finance, IR, IT, HR
Board of directors (8: 1 MD, 3 WTDs, 4 independent)
Director
Category
Appointed
Other directorships
Note
Sachin Agarwal
Promoter, CMD
18 Jun 1998
11
Chairs Banking, Project Monitoring & Environment, and Listing committees
Priya Ranjan Agarwal
Promoter group, WTD
28 Dec 1992
3
Alok Agarwal
Promoter group, WTD
27 Jul 1994
2
Risk Management Committee member
Smita Agarwal
Promoter group, WTD & CFO
1 Jun 2019
6
Spouse of CMD
Vishal Mehrotra
Independent
10 Aug 2019 (5-yr term from 9 Aug 2024)
Nil
Chairs NRC
Prashuka Jain
Independent (woman)
5 Sep 2022
Nil
Chairs a board committee (per AR)
Kamesh Gupta
Independent (Bengaluru)
1 Oct 2024
1
Rakesh Shukla
Independent; retired senior banker
20 Feb 2025
Nil
Remuneration
₹ lakh
FY24
FY25
FY26
Apr–Aug 2026
Note
Sachin Agarwal (CMD)
n/d
333.0
492.5 (+47.9%)
214.0
Incl. 3% commission on consolidated profits; 188.7x median employee pay; 14.9% of standalone PAT
Priya Ranjan Agarwal
n/d
78.4
107.3
n/d
Incl. 0.6% commission on domestic defence sales realised
Alok Agarwal
n/d
n/d
46.4
n/d
Smita Agarwal
n/d
41.1
46.3
n/d
Total KMP compensation (standalone)
n/d
557.7
705.2
—
Independent directors’ sitting fees
tiny
~8
~11
~6
₹1.4–3.5 lakh each per year
Shareholding pattern
%
Jun-25
Sep-25
Dec-25
Mar-26
Jun-26
Post-QIP (Oct-26)
Promoter & group
59.75
59.75
59.72
59.72
59.72
56.46
FIIs
3.39
3.41
3.86
3.95
3.95
n/d
DIIs
7.73
8.51
8.45
9.21
9.35
n/d
Institutions total
11.12
11.92
12.31
13.16
13.30
18.43
Public & others
29.14
28.32
27.98
27.12
26.98
25.11
No. of shareholders
22,707
22,554
23,826
23,581
26,540
—
Holder
Shares
% pre-QIP
Type
Sachin Agarwal
28,55,491
19.05
Promoter
Mapple Commerce Pvt Ltd
15,99,985
10.67
Promoter group co.
Nirala Merchants Pvt Ltd
11,77,818
7.86
Promoter group co.
Priya Ranjan Agarwal
9,87,914
6.59
Promoter group
Satish Chandra Agarwal HUF
6,70,297
4.47
Promoter group
Alok Agarwal
5,45,799
3.64
Promoter group
Viven Advisory Services Pvt Ltd
4,33,325
2.89
Promoter group co.
Smita Agarwal
3,35,276
2.24
Promoter group
Anshoo Agarwal
1,85,041
1.23
Promoter group
Motilal Oswal (MF schemes)
5,74,338
3.83
DII
Vikas … (name truncated in filing extract)
3,85,346
2.57
Public >1%
Mona Russell
3,48,983
2.33
Public >1%
HSBC Mutual Fund
1,62,934
1.09
DII
Pankaj Prasoon
1,62,000
1.08
Public >1%
Mukul Mahavir (Agrawal)
1,60,000
1.07
Public >1%
Largest Oct-2026 QIP allottees (% of post-issue capital): SmallCap World Fund (Capital Group) 1.04%, HSBC Small Cap Fund 0.76%, Fidelity Blue Chip Growth 0.62%, Fidelity India Focus 0.40%, plus Fidelity EM funds, BNP Paribas ODI, ADIA (Monsoon), Tata AIA, Motilal Oswal, ITI, HDFC Defence/Manufacturing, Trust MF, Union, Bandhan, Susquehanna and others (>40 allottees). Promoters did not participate. [Fact]
Pledge, insider and SAST activity
Pledge/encumbrance: 6,000 shares held by Kanchan Agarwal (promoter group) encumbered — 0.04% of equity. No other promoter pledge. [Fact]
Promoter-group shares fell from 90,90,580 (Mar-24) to 89,53,441 (Mar-25) — a 1,37,139-share decline that reconciles exactly to (a) reclassification of Bina Agrawal, Kiran Arun Prasad and Arun Jwala Prasad (1,30,860 shares) from promoter group to public, approved by the exchanges on 2 Aug 2024, plus (b) a 6,000-share reduction in Alok Agarwal’s holding and (c) 279 shares in another family holding. Precision Overseas Pvt Ltd held nil in both years. No change in FY26. [Fact] (FY25 and FY26 annual reports, promoter-holding notes)
Promoter holding fell 67.93% (Mar-23) → 56.46% (post-QIP) almost entirely through primary issuance. [Fact]
Insider-trading (PIT) disclosures for the last 12 months: not retrieved — data gap. Promoters did not participate in the Oct-2026 QIP. [Fact]
Related-party transactions (standalone, FY26)
Counterparty
Nature
FY26 (₹ lakh)
FY25 (₹ lakh)
Aerolloy Technologies
Equity investment via rights (21,69,500 sh @ ₹1,000; 2,67,107 sh @ ₹2,490)
28,346
21,990 (investment made, as disclosed)
Trac Holdings
Unsecured loan GBP 0.6m @ 6.5%
725
—
KMP
Managerial remuneration
725 (comp. 705)
424–558
Relatives of KMP
Rent paid; salaries
~9 rent; ~48 salary
~9; ~50
Investment at cost in Aerolloy (cumulative)
—
69,206
40,857
RPT table in AR is poorly formatted in the PDF; amounts shown are as best reconstructed. All RPTs stated to be at arm’s length. Corporate guarantees given for subsidiaries’ loans. [Fact]/[Est.]
Subsidiaries & group structure
Entity
Holding
Business
Contribution
Status
Aerolloy Technologies Ltd (inc. 17 Feb 2020)
100% direct
Ti & superalloy materials, aerospace castings, forgings — SMTC Lucknow
FY26 income ₹190.4 Cr, PAT ₹68.0 Cr (~67% of group PAT)
Core growth engine; ICRA A/A1
Trac Holdings Ltd (UK)
100% direct (acquired Dec 2024 for ₹181.2 Cr; UK NSIA clearance)
Acquisition track record: (1) Trac (Dec 2024, ₹181 Cr for a £24.8m-revenue business ≈ 0.7x sales) — strategically coherent (casting-to-finished-part), financially still marginal (~6–8.5% EBITDA). (2) Used VAR (2021), EBCHR (2022) and PAM (2023) furnaces and a US hot rolling mill (2024) — cheap entry, slow commissioning. (3) 1998 amalgamation of Sunika Alloys and Ashman Tools Engineers. No “Alloy Cast” acquisition was found in the placement document’s acquisition table, AR or press releases; a 2023 MoU with Nasmyth (UK) is a supply-chain MoU, not an acquisition. ₹621 Cr of QIP money is reserved for unidentified acquisitions. [Fact]
Auditor, litigation, regulatory
Item
Detail
Statutory auditor
S. N. Dhawan & Co LLP (FRN 000050N/N500045), appointed at 60th AGM (2023) for 5 years to 65th AGM. No qualification, reservation or adverse remark in FY26 or prior five years (per placement doc). Cost auditor: Aman Malviya & Associates
Alleges non-receipt of notice of the 2022 rights issue; seeks transfer of 64,800 shares at par or damages of ~₹94.7 Cr against the company and present/former directors. PTC has applied for rejection of plaint and challenged jurisdiction; pending. Aggregate litigation against company ₹97.5 Cr (incl. tax)
4 tax proceedings against company (amounts within the ₹97.5 Cr aggregate); disputed GST ₹16.6 lakh
Historic filings
RoC returns of allotment for 1963–1998 not traceable; reliance on PCS search report (risk factor). Placement doc also flags possible delayed/erroneous ROC filings
SEBI / MCA actions, wilful default, fugitive status
None disclosed
Governance red flags & mitigants
Family-heavy board: 4 of 8 directors are promoter group; CFO is the CMD’s spouse. Mitigant: four independents incl. a retired banker; Big-firm-alumna CFO. [Analyst View]
Serial dilution at rising prices (7 primary issues since 2022) and 35% of the latest QIP for unidentified acquisitions. [Analyst View]
CMD pay linked to consolidated profit (3% commission), up 48% in FY26 while standalone PAT fell 6%. [Fact]
Promotional disclosure style: “landmark” announcements without contract values (Airbus, Honeywell, BrahMos sub-system); headline EBITDA includes other income. [Analyst View]
Positives: unqualified audits, minimal pledge, ICRA upgrade, CRISIL as QIP monitoring agency, quarterly monitoring-agency reports on prior QIP. [Fact]
Supply Chain
Upstream dependencies and downstream customers. Placement document (Oct 2026), FY26 AR, ICRA (Mar 2026), press releases. [Fact] unless marked.
Value chain map
Ore & spongeIlmenite/rutile → titanium sponge (Japan, Kazakhstan, Russia, China, US; Saudi AMIC-TOHO). India has 3rd-largest Ti ore reserves but no aerospace-grade sponge
→
Alloying inputsNi & Co master alloys, superalloy feedstock, ferro-alloys; Ti scrap (recycling via PAM/EBCHR)
Tier-1 / OEMSafran (LEAP), Honeywell, Airbus, Dassault, BAE, Blue Origin, BrahMos, DRDO labs, ISRO, Siemens Energy
→
End userAirlines (IndiGo, Air India), Indian Armed Forces, space launch, power utilities, oil & gas
↑ Upstream — what PTC Industries depends on
Input
Use
Source / dependence
Risk
Titanium sponge (incl. Grade 1)
Feedstock for VAR/PAM ingots, Ti castings
Largely imported against advance payment or LCs; global aerospace-grade sponge made only in a handful of countries (US, Russia, Kazakhstan, Japan per company); MoU with AMIC TOHO Titanium Metal Co. (Saudi Arabia); proposed Odisha sponge plant (MoU 30 Jan 2025)
High — geopolitical, export controls; payable days only ~28
Titanium scrap / revert
EBCHR / PAM recycling (GreenTitanium™)
Internal returns + purchased scrap; EBCHR still commissioning
Existing VAR/EBCHR plant re-installed by German OEM; PAM (purchase agreement 2023); US hot rolling mill; Makino, Sodick (Japan) machine tools at Trac
Single-OEM dependence for re-commissioning and spares
Medium — commissioning delays observed
Power, fuel, water
Vacuum melting is energy-intensive
Grid + 700 kW rooftop solar + 0.75 MW wind (Kutch); 20 MW solar planned
Medium — Q1 FY27 power & fuel ₹10.3 Cr (+60% YoY)
Licensed technology
Replicast® process licensed from third party
Licence dependence
Low
Supplier concentration
FY24
FY25
FY26
Q1 FY26
Q1 FY27
Top-5 suppliers, % of revenue
12.6%
18.5%
12.4%
18.8%
11.9%
Top-10 suppliers, % of revenue
17.1%
25.1%
16.2%
23.0%
15.9%
Cost of materials consumed, % of revenue
22.1%
28.9%
56.8%
42.1%
39.6%
Net material cost (after inventory change), % revenue
n/d
17.3%
17.6%
n/d
~14% [Est.]
~38 raw-material suppliers (30 Jun 2026). Gross material consumption quadrupled in FY26 as Aerolloy began melting sponge into ingots, but most of it sat in WIP (₹236.7 Cr inventory build), so net material cost stayed ~17.6% of revenue. Pass-through: contracts provide indexation/pass-through “where feasible”; ICRA notes a “dynamic pricing strategy”. Mitigants: multi-vendor sourcing, contingency stock, backward integration (VAR/PAM/EBCHR), sponge MoUs. [Fact]
↓ Downstream — who depends on PTC Industries
Customer concentration
FY24
FY25
FY26
Q1 FY26
Q1 FY27
Top-5 customer groups, % of revenue
67.6%
60.4%
57.7%
69.4%
63.3%
Top-10 customer groups, % of revenue
85.1%
82.9%
85.2%
89.0%
83.6%
Exports, % of sale of products
84.0%
85.6%
81.8%
88.4%
67.0%
End market
Customers (named)
End products containing PTC output
Stickiness / tenor
Commercial aero-engines
Safran Aircraft Engines (CFM LEAP-1A/1B), Honeywell; via Trac: Rolls-Royce, Safran, GE
LEAP engines on A320neo/737 MAX; turbine blades, vanes, frames
LTAs; multi-year qualification → very sticky once qualified
Commercial airframes
Airbus (A320neo/A330neo/A350), Dassault Falcon
Ti structural castings, ready-to-fit
Development → qualification → serial; contract value n/d
Design-win dynamics: new business starts with an RFQ or development order → part/process/material qualification (“a few months to several years”) → low-rate initial production → serial supply; once a process is qualified, additional parts qualify incrementally. Single-source positions on qualified parts are hard to displace, but customers can dual-source or in-source. [Fact]
Where pricing power sits
Upstream: sponge producers hold pricing power (few qualified sources, geopolitics); PTC is a small buyer paying in advance. Downstream: the primes (Airbus, Safran, Honeywell, Rolls-Royce) hold it during qualification and at contract award; after qualification the balance shifts towards the qualified supplier because re-qualifying an alternative takes years. PTC’s 45% Aerolloy EBITDA margin suggests it is earning a scarcity premium on niche Ti/superalloy parts today; long-term agreements usually carry annual price-down clauses (not disclosed for PTC). Backward integration (EBCHR recycling, Odisha sponge) is the lever to protect margin from sponge price shocks. [Analyst View]
Competitive Position
Peer data: Screener.in consolidated pages fetched 12 Oct 2026 (FY26 annual, price-based ratios at that date). EV/EBITDA for peers not retrieved — shown as NA rather than estimated.
Market position
In India, PTC/Aerolloy is the only private company combining aerospace-grade titanium melting (VAR/PAM, EBCHR pending), superalloy VIM, large titanium and superalloy investment castings, open-die forging and an overseas hot-section machining arm. The state-owned MIDHANI (Mishra Dhatu Nigam) is the closest materials peer (titanium, superalloys, special steels) but is a mill-products producer, not a precision caster. Component makers such as Azad Engineering (aero/energy turbine airfoils), MTAR (precision assemblies for space/nuclear/clean energy), Paras Defence (optics/electronics) and Bharat Forge (forgings, artillery, aero-structures via Kalyani Strategic Systems) overlap at parts of the chain. Globally, PTC competes with PCC (Precision Castparts, Berkshire Hathaway), Howmet Aerospace, Consolidated Precision Products, Doncasters, ATI, Carpenter and VSMPO-AVISMA — incumbents with decades of qualifications and far larger scale. No market-share data is published. [Fact]/[Analyst View]
*PTC on post-QIP share count at ₹25,339 (Screener shows ₹37,989 Cr / 302x on pre-QIP count). Peer prices as fetched 12 Oct 2026. Mcap/sales computed on FY26 revenue. [Est.]
Strengths and weaknesses vs each peer
Peer
PTC stronger on
PTC weaker on
Azad Engineering
Owns melting (material security), castings and titanium; space/defence breadth
Azad has higher margins (37%), better RoE, cleaner cash conversion, larger qualified aero-engine order book with disclosed values
MTAR
Materials know-how; aerospace primes as customers
MTAR has larger revenue base, higher RoE, established nuclear/space franchises
MIDHANI
Precision casting, forging and machining downstream; private-sector agility; export customers
MIDHANI has decades of defence qualifications, larger melt capacity, lower valuation (6.8x sales)
Paras
Hard-metal and materials depth
Different niche; Paras more cash-generative relative to size
Bharat Forge
Titanium/superalloy materials and investment casting
Massive scale, balance sheet, defence order book, cheaper valuation
Global incumbents (PCC, Howmet, CPP, Doncasters)
India cost base; “China+1/Russia-free” titanium; government support
Scale, decades of part numbers, single-crystal production heritage, pricing power
Industry structure, barriers and Porter’s Five Forces
High for sponge and Ni/Co (concentrated, geopolitical); mitigated by recycling and MoUs
High
Buyer power
High pre-qualification (few large primes, price-downs); falls after qualification
Medium–High
Threat of substitutes
Forgings/additive manufacturing/composites can substitute castings on some parts; PTC hedges with forging, powder metallurgy
Medium
Rivalry
Global oligopoly in aero castings/airfoils; supply-constrained post-COVID, especially for large structural Ti and SX airfoils
Medium
Moat durability is high once parts are qualified, but PTC’s moat today is mostly prospective: most of the headline programmes (Airbus, Honeywell, Blue Origin, GTRE) are in development or qualification. The industry is consolidated globally and supply-short in large Ti structural castings and hot-section airfoils, which gives a new, credible entrant room to win share — the key question is how fast. [Analyst View]
Risks & Red Flags
Comprehensive register. Severity is our assessment. [Analyst View]
Risk
Category
Severity
Explanation
Mitigant
Valuation de-rating
Financial / Market
High
~320x TTM P/E, ~12x P/B, ~62x re-based FY28E broker EPS; CMP above QIP price and only published target. Any qualification delay or quarterly miss could compress the multiple sharply
Strong institutional demand in QIP (Capital Group, Fidelity, HSBC, ADIA); scarcity of listed Ti plays
Negative / weak operating cash flow
Financial
High
CFO negative in FY24 and FY26; 5-yr cumulative CFO −₹79 Cr vs PAT ₹244 Cr; CCC ~970 days (Screener)
ISO 14001/45001; ZLD; renewables; 20 MW solar planned
Technology obsolescence / substitution
Business
Low
Additive manufacturing or forgings substituting castings
Investments in powder metallurgy, forging, PrintCast
Talent scarcity
Execution
Medium
Aerospace metallurgy skills scarce; employee cost 25% of revenue in FY26
STrIDE Academy, GET programme, foreign hires
Credit / counterparty
Financial
Low
Receivables ₹274 Cr; ECL only ₹0.23 Cr
Blue-chip primes, DPSUs, export credit insurance
Corporate guarantees to subsidiaries
Financial
Low
Parent guarantees for subsidiaries’ loans
Net cash post-QIP
Red-flag summary
Profits not converting to cash (5-yr CFO negative).
Serial equity issuance; 60% of new QIP without a named use.
Capex plans repeatedly upsized and delayed.
Headline “EBITDA” includes other income; “landmark” orders without values; no order-book disclosure.
CMP above the QIP price set days earlier and above the sole published target.
Concall Highlights & Guidance
Earnings calls/analyst meets were held (Screener lists transcripts for Aug 2025, Nov 2025, Feb 2026, Jun 2026 and Aug 2026), but the transcript files were behind a login and not retrievable in this session; the exchange API was blocked and the web-search budget was exhausted. This tab is therefore built from the company’s results presentations, press releases, the FY26 annual report’s MD&A, ICRA’s March 2026 rationale (which reflects management discussions) and ICICI Securities’ 2 Jun 2026 post-call note. Treat quotes as from written releases unless stated. QC re-check (12 Oct 2026): the company’s investor-relations compliance page hosts no call transcripts or audio (only analyst-meet intimations), and Screener exposes a transcript link only for the Jun-2023 call; no FY26–FY27 transcript could be obtained, so no call commentary has been added.
Quarter by quarter
Quarter (date)
Key numbers
Highlights / management words
Tone
Q1 FY26 (Aug 2025)
Total income ₹107.7 Cr (+>100%); EBITDA ₹19.4 Cr (18.0%); PAT ₹5.2 Cr; Aerolloy EBITDA ₹8.1 Cr (from ₹2.8 Cr)
“We remain on track to achieve our budgeted revenue and EBITDA margin targets for the year.” Safran MoU on military engines; SMTC inaugurated 11 May 2025
Confident
Q2 FY26 (Nov 2025)
H1 total income ₹240.5 Cr (+83%); EBITDA ₹53.3 Cr (+23%); Aerolloy H1 ₹42.1 Cr, 51.3% EBITDA
“EBITDA margins were temporarily impacted by the consolidation of Trac … we see this as a short-term effect.” BrahMos ₹110 Cr order (24 months); GTRE SX blades; Coolbrook; VIM & VAR-400 commissioned; Lokarpan 18 Oct 2025
Confident, defensive on margin
Q3 FY26 (Feb 2026)
9M total income ₹406.0 Cr; EBITDA ₹87.9 Cr (+27.7%); Aerolloy 9M ₹91.3 Cr (39.3%); Trac 9M ₹167.2 Cr
Blue Origin BE-4 order; Honeywell LTA; VSSC double-VAR ingots; PLI 1.2 MoUs; PAM installed. Positioned as “uniquely placed” for mission-critical materials
Promotional
Q4 FY26 (2–3 Jun 2026)
Q4 total income ₹237.3 Cr (+77%); EBITDA ₹84.4 Cr (35.6%); PAT ₹59.9 Cr (+144%). FY26 PAT ₹101.6 Cr
“FY26 has been a defining year … we moved from capability creation to scaled execution.” Forging press trials done; second Makino G7 at Trac; TITANIUM Europe 2026; ICRA upgrade. I-Sec post-call: EBCHR to commission in Q1 FY27; approval/order-building phase for ~2 years, “exponential” execution from FY29
Very confident
Q1 FY27 (14 Aug 2026; analyst meet 31 Aug 2026)
Total income ₹197.1 Cr (+83%); EBITDA ₹54.2 Cr (27.5%); PAT ₹29.2 Cr (+466%); Aerolloy ₹74.3 Cr (45%); Trac ₹71.4 Cr
“As these capabilities mature and programmes progress through qualification, industrialisation and scale-up, our focus remains on disciplined execution and sustainable growth.” Airbus agreement; BrahMos sub-system; ARDE; Gun Factory Kanpur; MoD visit
Confident but more measured
Pre-QIP investor meetings (Q2 FY27)
—
One-on-ones disclosed with Capital Group, Fidelity Management & Research, HSBC, SBI MF, ICICI Prudential, Union MF, Aditya Birla Sun Life, Axis AMC — several became QIP allottees
—
Guidance vs outcome — credibility check
Guidance / expectation
Given
Outcome
Verdict
VAR + EBCHR Phase-1: ~₹125 Cr over 2 years; world’s largest single-site Ti recycling
Aug 2022
Group capex ~₹624 Cr FY24–26; EBCHR still “under commissioning” Oct 2026
Missed (cost and time)
Dassault: Aerolloy to produce full range of Rafale/Falcon Ti castings “from 2024 onwards”
Jan 2024
Supply ongoing; volumes not disclosed
Unverifiable
“On track for budgeted revenue and EBITDA margin targets”
Aug 2025
Revenue +96%; company EBITDA margin 26.8% vs 32.0% in FY25 (core 22.2% vs 24.4%)
Mixed (budget never disclosed)
Trac margin dilution “short-term”
Nov 2025
Trac EBITDA 6.3% FY26, 8.5% Q1 FY27
Partially delivered
Revenue to more than double over FY26–27 from ₹308 Cr; OPM 20–22% by FY27 (ICRA, based on management inputs)
Mar 2026
FY26 revenue ₹603 Cr; Q1 FY27 core OPM 25%
Ahead
EBCHR commissioning Q1 FY27; EBCHR + rolling mill in H1 FY27 (I-Sec)
Jun 2026
Still commissioning/installing per 9 Oct 2026 placement document
Slipping
Working-capital reversal “a priority for FY27”
AR FY26 (Jul 2026)
Q1 FY27 CFO +₹44 Cr (receivables −₹32 Cr)
Early positive
Recurring themes, analyst concerns and contradictions
Themes: “PTC ONE — From Melt to Mission”; parity/Aatmanirbhar Bharat; integration; qualification → serial production; operating leverage at Aerolloy.
Concerns raised by analysts/agencies (from I-Sec and ICRA): delay in commissioning and ramp-up of new capacity; lengthy and expensive product development/approvals; working-capital intensity (117% in FY25); execution of the largest capacity programme in the company’s history.
Contradiction 1: ICRA (Mar 2026) was told the ~₹500 Cr capex would be funded by debt, accruals and existing liquidity, and (Apr 2026, Aerolloy) that the ~₹700 Cr SMTC project had ~₹300 Cr left to spend, the project being partly debt-funded (~₹300 Cr debt); six months later ₹551 Cr of QIP equity is earmarked for subsidiary capex (₹480 Cr for Aerolloy alone) plus ₹621 Cr for unidentified acquisitions. The gap between ~₹300 Cr remaining and ₹480–499 Cr now earmarked is unexplained. [Analyst View]
Contradiction 2: Headline “EBITDA margin expansion of 954 bps” in Q1 FY27 includes other income; Q1 FY27 core margin (25%) is below Q4 FY26 (32%). [Analyst View]
No order-book number is given in any presentation despite repeated reference to “order book” and “multi-year visibility”. [Fact]
Tone trajectory: from promotional (“landmark”, “historic”) in FY26 to slightly more measured (“disciplined execution”, “qualification, industrialisation and scale-up”) in Q1 FY27. [Analyst View]
Growth, Outlook & Valuation
Order visibility, expansion, catalysts, estimates and valuation. Valuation on post-QIP share count (1,58,47,249) at ₹25,339 unless stated.
Order book & revenue visibility
Data gap
No order-book figure is disclosed in the FY26 annual report, results presentations, ICRA rationale or the QIP placement document (searched). ICRA refers to a “healthy order book, including some key long-term contracts”; I-Sec says the next two years are an “order build-up phase”. Book-to-bill and % contracted revenue: not available. [Fact]
Order / agreement
Customer
Date
Value
Tenor / stage
Critical titanium castings
BrahMos Aerospace
21 Aug 2025
₹110 Cr (“100+ crore”)
24 months
Strategic metallic airframe system & integration
BrahMos Aerospace
17 Jul 2026
Not disclosed
Development, integration, supply
Ti castings A320neo/A330neo/A350
Airbus
6 Aug 2026
Not disclosed
Development → qualification → serial
LEAP-1A/1B cast components (7 parts)
Safran Aircraft Engines
28 Mar 2025
Not disclosed
Long-term PO
Ti & superalloy castings LTA
Honeywell Aerospace
2025 (FY26)
Not disclosed
Long-term; dedicated capacity
BE-4 LOX housings/manifolds
Blue Origin
Jan 2026
Not disclosed
Development & supply
SX ready-to-fit blades post-cast ops
GTRE (DRDO)
Oct 2025
Not disclosed
Development
Double-VAR Ti-6Al-4V ingots (~40 t sponge conversion)
VSSC (ISRO)
FY26 Q3
Not disclosed
Order
M777 Ti castings production order
BAE Systems
27 Sep 2024
Not disclosed
Serial
Rafale/Falcon Ti castings LTPA
Dassault Aviation
17 Jan 2024
Not disclosed
Multi-year
RDH components (27,000 parts/yr at full rate)
Coolbrook (via Trac)
2 Oct 2025
>£10m p.a. expected at full production
Phase 2 pending
Ti cradle (105 mm light tank); artillery components
ARDE; Gun Factory Kanpur
Jul–Aug 2026
Not disclosed
Design & development
Expansion plans
Project
Spend
Timeline
Status
EBCHR 5,000 tpa Ti recycling (GreenTitanium™)
Within SMTC programme
Was Q1 FY27 (I-Sec)
Under commissioning
Rolling / plate mills (plates, sheets, rods, bars)
Within SMTC programme
H1 FY27 (I-Sec)
Under installation
Aerolloy facility expansion (P&M)
₹499.3 Cr (₹480 Cr from QIP)
FY27–FY28
Quotations only; not appraised
Trac UK expansion (EDM, grinding, brazing, coating, inspection)
Space launch cadence (Blue Origin, ISRO); IGT demand from AI data-centre power
Integration to ready-to-fit parts and sub-systems (higher value per kg)
Estimates — the only published broker model
ICICI Securities (2 Jun 2026; BUY, TP ₹21,500)
FY25A
FY26A
FY27E
FY28E
Revenue (₹ Cr)
308
603
1,054
2,187
EBITDA (₹ Cr, core)
75
132
347
841
EBITDA margin
24.4%
21.9%
32.9%
38.4%
PAT (₹ Cr)
61
102
260
645
EPS as published (1.499 Cr shares)
40.7
67.8
173.6
430.5
EPS re-based to 1.585 Cr shares [Est.]
—
64.1
164.2
407.0
P/E at ₹25,339 on re-based EPS [Est.]
—
395x
154x
62x
Management gives no numeric revenue/margin guidance. Consensus (multiple brokers) not available in sources accessed. I-Sec TP = 50x FY28E EPS; CMP is 18% above it. Re-basing ignores interest income on the new QIP cash, which would add to FY27–28 PAT. [Fact]/[Est.]
Valuation vs history and peers
Metric
Current
FY26 (avg price)
FY25 (avg price)
FY24 (avg price)
3-yr avg
P/E (on that year’s EPS)
~320x TTM (post-QIP)
236x
303x
203x
~247x [Est.]
P/B
~12.0x (post-QIP book)
~15.9x
n/d
n/d
—
EV / core EBITDA (TTM)
~224x
—
—
—
—
EV / sales (TTM)
~55x
—
—
—
—
Dividend yield
0%
0%
0%
0%
—
Average NSE closing prices: FY24 ₹5,941, FY25 ₹12,337, FY26 ₹15,972 (placement document). EV ≈ mcap ₹40,156 Cr + debt ₹274 Cr − cash ~₹1,950 Cr (incl. net QIP proceeds) ≈ ₹38,480 Cr. Peer P/E range 61–175x (MIDHANI to MTAR); PTC trades at ~2x the most expensive peer. No buybacks ever. [Est.]
Scenario framework (12–18 months) — our view
Scenario
Assumption
FY28E PAT
Multiple
Implied equity value
Per share
Bull
Qualifications on time; EBCHR live; I-Sec FY28E achieved
₹645 Cr
70x + net cash ~₹1,500 Cr
~₹46,650 Cr
~₹29,400
Base
~1-year slip in programme ramp; Aerolloy margins hold ~40%
Illustrative, not a recommendation. Net cash assumes most QIP cash still on balance sheet in 2027–28 less capex. Probability-weighted (25/50/25) ≈ ₹18,400/share, ~27% below CMP. [Analyst View]
Final Verdict
Scores consistent with the Snapshot tab. [Analyst View]
Business Quality
Strong
Management Quality
Medium
Financial Quality
Weak
Valuation
Expensive
Overall View
Neutral
Dimension
Why
Business — Strong
Only integrated Ti/superalloy melt-cast-forge-machine platform in India; LTAs with Safran, Honeywell, Dassault, Airbus; NADCAP/AS9100/CEMILAC; Aerolloy 45–47% EBITDA
Management — Medium
Visionary and technically capable; delivered SMTC and global customer wins. But repeated dilution, upsized/late capex, 60% of QIP without named use, promotional disclosures, family-dominated board
Financial — Weak
RoE 7%, RoCE 8%; CFO negative in 2 of last 3 years; CCC ~970 days; other income 30–42% of PBT; standalone profits falling
Valuation — Expensive
~320x TTM, ~154x/62x re-based FY27E/FY28E; ~12x book; above QIP price and sole target
Overall — Neutral
Own-the-business, not-at-this-price: positive on franchise, negative on entry point; revisit on cash-flow proof or a 30–40% lower price
Bull case
Airbus, Safran LEAP, Honeywell and Blue Origin move to serial production in FY28–29; Aerolloy becomes a ₹1,500 Cr+ revenue, 40% margin business.
EBCHR recycling gives a structural cost advantage in Ti ingots and plates; PLI 1.2 incentives add to margins.
Defence sub-systems (BrahMos, ARDE, artillery) lift value per order; Indian strategic scarcity sustains a premium multiple.
Bear case
Qualification slips 1–2 years; WIP and receivables keep CFO negative; EPS growth disappoints vs ~62x FY28E.
Acquisition kitty deployed into a low-return asset (Trac-like margins); further dilution.
Commissioning problems with the re-installed EBCHR and the rolling mills; Ti sponge supply shock squeezes margins.
Base case (12–18 m)
Revenue grows 50–70% in FY27 on Aerolloy and Trac, but quarterly lumpiness persists; EBCHR commissions late FY27; QIP interest income props PAT; CFO turns modestly positive. Earnings rise but the multiple compresses toward 150–200x FY27 EPS — implying flat-to-lower stock returns from ₹25,339. [Analyst View]
Five things to remember
Aerolloy is the profit engine (~67% of FY26 PAT); the legacy standalone business is shrinking in profit.
~40% of FY26 revenue came from the Trac acquisition, a ~6% EBITDA business.
Five-year cumulative CFO is negative (−₹79 Cr) against ₹244 Cr of PAT; FCF ≈ −₹827 Cr.
Share count has tripled since 2022; ~₹2,910 Cr raised, ₹621 Cr of the latest QIP is for unidentified acquisitions.
At ₹25,339 the stock trades ~320x TTM, above its own QIP price (₹21,060) and the only published target (₹21,500).
Five questions to ask before investing
What is the contracted order book and expected revenue from Airbus, Safran, Honeywell and Blue Origin by year, and when does each part reach serial production?
When exactly will EBCHR and the rolling mills be commissioned, and what were the cumulative costs vs the 2022 plan?
What is the ₹621 Cr acquisition kitty for — sector, geography, size, return hurdle — and why is SMTC capex that ICRA (Mar/Apr 2026) expected to be partly debt-funded (~₹300 Cr of debt), with ~₹300 Cr left to spend, now allotted ₹480 Cr of QIP equity?
How much of the ₹236 Cr WIP is tied to parts not yet qualified, and what is the write-down policy?
What are Trac’s standalone PAT and margin path, and is the ₹63 Cr goodwill at risk?
PTC Industries is building something genuinely scarce — an Indian titanium and superalloy champion with real customer validation. But reported profits are not yet cash, the company keeps raising equity, and at ~320x trailing earnings the market has already paid for FY29-30. We are Neutral: accumulate only on proof of cash conversion and commissioning, or a materially lower price.
Sources
All URLs accessed 12 Oct 2026. Primary documents downloaded and text-extracted locally. Links open externally; the report itself makes no network requests.